de mori doesn't have much support here at least. i think alex is just respected more. he's doing his best to test himself, and not just talking about it all the time.
I chose De Mori because he can string two words together and sound reasonably inteligent and he is as fit as. He must work out a bit, great to see a fighter keep in shape.
alex by ko early, fight wont happen, de mori is tryin to do a mundine and fight nobody's, his fights are done with his mouth
I don't mind either of them. They've headed in different directions and have very different personalities. Alex has done more in the same time, but I wouldn't say he's really any better than Mark. Mark is fairly untested, while Alex has been in some reasonable battles lately, although he's looked pretty shithouse in a few. I think Alex is more limited than Mark, but probably more seasoned. Mark is potentially the more skilled fighter IMO. If they met now, it would be a very close fight, with perhaps plain old ring experience allowing Alex to nudge the win. If Mark keeps fighting regularly, I think he has the potential to beat Alex real soon. Both will only ever be journeymen, and neither will ever take on the Klits, and if they did would both be annihilated. By historical global standards, IE, Ali, Foreman, Frasier, Tyson, etc, they are both complete garbage. By OZ standards, they're ok. The haters on this forum from both sides are ****ed in the head.
How about trying to analysis the fight instead of supporting anyone? It may give you a clearer view on boxing in general. Just a thought.
