Who do you consider the best heavyweight of all-time?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jul 21, 2008.


  1. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006
    Louis, by a hairs breadth IMO.
     
  2. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006
    1. Louis
    2. Ali
    3. Holmes
    4. Lewis
    5. Marciano or Liston
     
  3. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    Nothing more to add there.
     
  4. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,794
    2,396
    Aug 26, 2004
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,058
    Oct 25, 2006
    For me it's Louis, although like most I'd say there's not much in it.

    Records and quality of opposition aside for a minute, I don't think anyone has had a bigger infulence on heavyweight boxing as has Joe Louis.
    Without Louis, black heavyweights would have been set back another 20 or 30 years. They all (all black fighters) owe Louis a huge debt of gratitude for the way he set the foundations for blacks in boxing to flourish.

    Let's not forget that in the 30's and 40's, there was also probably nobody alive who was more famous. These things have tended to diminish in the memory as the years have rolled on, but Louis for me did far more than Ali outside the ring, and arguably more inside it too.
     
  6. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    85
    Jul 9, 2008
    Muhammed Ali of the mid to late 60's was the best fighter I've ever seen at any weight. He was destroying guys. The argument against is that he wasn't well rounded and not a great in-fighter. He didn't have to be because his skills were so overwhelming at the time.
     
  7. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    :patsch
     
  8. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    Ali is slightly favored here due to quality of conquests...

    However, Louis was more skilled than Ali -and not by a little. Louis's reportoire included pivots and subtle shifts and short combinations that are hard to appreciate on grainy old films.

    Ali had a flashier style and great gams but Futch was not off when he saw numerous technical shortcomings in Ali or when he asserted that Ali "does the same thing over and over" -he was spectacular at it, but let's not call it skill. It was speed and flashiness. It was talent.

    Think about how suggestive it is that Futch, who served his apprenticeship with Louis, and was a contemporary of Louis, so easily devised strategies to defeat Ali and did so with otherwise flawed fighters in Frazier and Norton.
     
  9. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
  10. LennoxGOAT

    LennoxGOAT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    4
    Apr 22, 2006
    Ali is the GOAT, but he would finish second in a H2H tournament.

    I like Louis, and he is a Top 3 on resume, but I think he would struggle in the 70's and 90's against the top tier.
     
  11. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Ali UD15.

    Flat-footed Louis wouldn't be able to handle Ali's boxing ability if he was getting schooled by Conn.

    Regardless of how skilled Louis was, his resume doesn't back it up to the extent of Ali's, and in a h2h matchup, I favor Ali.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Who wouldnt?
     
  13. LennoxGOAT

    LennoxGOAT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    4
    Apr 22, 2006
    True, but I feel he would be on the lower end of the spectrum of the elites. Below the third tier of Frazier and Tyson.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I find that verry unlikley.

    He had more tools on paper than either of them and more importantly he did not loose his focus once the title was in his hands like they did.

    I dont know if anybody in the 70s or 90s would have beaten him at their best and even if they could he would have had a much longer prime which which would have overlaped with a point when they were not at their best.
     
  15. LennoxGOAT

    LennoxGOAT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,234
    4
    Apr 22, 2006
    Just agree to disagree. I think Louis' athleticism and footwork is highly overrated and like you said, his mental toughness is highly underrated. Of course the latter is kryptonite to Tyson. So I guess you never know.

    But I definitely would not bet on Louis beating the first and second tier of those eras.