Who do you guys like to see Golovkin fight next at 160?

Yeah, that's how things go down behind the scenes.




Let's suppose he can't get Lara, Canelo, Jacobs, Saunders or Eubank next for various reasons.

Let's say he then takes his mando to get it out of the way, hoping that he can get one of those fights afterwards.

Then what?

Will you allow for his circumstances that you claim you allow for?

No.

If that happens, you'll make a thread ripping him for fighting a weak mando and criticising his resume.

 

And what if those fights can't be made for various reasons?

 

ur ok with bum mandos! lol...typical

one of the various reasons he couldn't get lara would be "he never even called him or tried"

bring on tureano Johnson! that's what the people want!

god you are pathetic....keep excusing weak fights

 

Jeez,

Are you on this planet??

No, I won't be happy with a weak mandatory you absolute imbecile. It will be extremely frustrating. But how can he be criticised for taking a mandatory IF HE CAN'T GET A MEANINGFUL OPPONENT for September!?

 

lara has openly called him out! even if lara is his last option amongst the list......lil g just needs to reach out and make an offer...and make the offer public...if lara don't like it and don't take it then its on lara.....and ill let lil g get away with a bum mando

but they need to make a public offer to him....they've already said he doesn't bring enough money and made other excuses for not even calling him over the last year.....they cant just say "he doesn't bring enough to the table" and dismiss him as an opponent like they've already tried to do

exhaust options on saunders Jacobs eubank...and make lara a public offer...and then he can fight a bum mando

that's the problem though...they fight bum mandos and never even reached out to lara...that's the issue

 

We don't know what's happening behind the scenes.

All you want to do is hate.

You're not interested in allowing for circumstances or looking at the big picture.

It's never occurred to you that it might be in GG's best interests to take a mandatory next.

If he fought Lara next, he'd probably fight a mandatory afterwards. But if he fights his mandatory next, there may be a chance of him fighting Eubank, Saunders or Jacobs etc afterwards towards the end of the year.

We just don't know.

 

oh I see the big picture man ...trust me

34 years old...terribly weak resume....let some welters/jr mws pass around the wbc belt for 2 years....and still 2 belts short of his silly dream to own all 4 alphabet trinkets

 

All great opponents, but I'd rather see the Jacobs fight grow by him making a few more minor defenses so it will be a more solid W for GGG next yr.

BJS won't be ready til late September.
Now, same for CEJ.

I'm hoping Jacobs allows Lara to step in for him.

 

Jacobs has exactly 2 wks to finalize a deal with Mendoza and the WBA.
Wish Haymon wasn't such a recluse and would return an email.

 

Jacobs is the NEXT MANDATE.

Mendoza said as much.

Only way out of the fight is if Lara or Callum Smith volunteer to make the fight.

And FTR.

GGG can allow them to fight at which ever weight.
Unless he fights for his SUPER title, at 160, he, himself could be stripped.

 

It won't be any of them, unfortunately.

 

He won't go to 168, remember?