Who do you have higher in all-time p4p terms and why: MONZON or WHITAKER

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Sep 9, 2008.

  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I always thought Whitaker, but I've been researching Monzon a bit lately, and I'm starting to question who was the greater of the two. I don't think either were as just as good as Duran or Leonard, I think both were slightly better than Hagler or Arguello, but I can't decide who was better of the two just now.

    Thoughts/opinions?


    An additional question those who post: do you have BOTH, EITHER ONE, or NONE in your top 10 of all-time?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,819
    Likes Received:
    47,699
    I rate Whitaker at #20 and Monzon at #24, I think, so very, very close. I think a case can be made for either. I think peak for peak Whitaker looks better on film and he achieved more at more weights, so I 'm happy with his slight lead of Carlos.
     
  3. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,650
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    Whitaker.

    A good number of Monzon's most lauded and recognizable wins are over fighters moving up, fighters much smaller than him. Not a good thing when discussing things in a P4P sense.
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,028
    Likes Received:
    106
    I actually have Whitaker one spot above Monzon. Both roughly around #15-20.

    As with McGrain, my reasoning is Pernell's success in multiple weights, being a rare fighter in the sense that he was a quite dominant champion in two divisions along with his belts in the other two, and that as brilliant as Monzon was, Pernell has always impressed me more. I can see the case for Monzon rating higher, or for Pernell being several spots above him. Really just depends on how you rate fighters, but I believe most will have Whitaker higher.
     
  5. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,028
    Likes Received:
    106
    True, but Pernell's best win, Nelson, also fits into that catagory (although it's not like there was a big size difference). Also, while Griffith was smaller, he's certainly a top 15 at middleweight and arguably top 10, where as Pernell never beat anyone who rates that highly at any of the divisions he beat them. Valdez is around #15 all-time at middleweight, and Benvenuti is around 20 himself. Because he beat three fighters, one that is probably inside or around the top 20 at the weight, one around 15, and one around 10, as well as Briscoe who is probably a top 30 at middle, and Napoles who while much smaller is likely a top 5 at welter, he arguably has the better resume even though Pernell beat men naturally bigger where as Monzon never did.
     
  6. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    81
    I rate Monzon a little higher. Yes, Whitaker excelled moving up in 5 to 7 pound incremements. Guys like Monzon and Hagler had huge 15 pound jumps to move up. There didn't seem to be too much demand to do it either.
    I'd give Whitaker an edge defensively but not as big as the edge I'd give Monzon offensively.
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    331
    Monzon 25 on my p4p list while Whitaker is 46. Keep in mind there are hundreds of fighters worth consideration
     
  8. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    331
    I actually have Hector Camacho ranked above Pernell too
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    27,199
    Likes Received:
    93
    Your rankings are meaningless, as always.
     
  10. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    27,199
    Likes Received:
    93
    His MW resume is better than the likes of Hagler and FAR greater than that of Hopkins. The smaller fighters he faced in Griffith and Napoles were better than any of the ones Hopkins faced, Griffith being a more accomplished MW than anyone Hagler faced, period. Not to mention his multiple wins over Valdez, Briscoe, Benvenuti, etc.
     
  11. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    15,217
    Likes Received:
    169
    You're a comedian and clearly not serious.
     
  12. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    331
    People act like it's an insult to be ranked below Hector but just remember how he went unbeaten for an entire decade, somthing few have ever been able to do. Their styles are very similar; both hard to hit southpaws, both have great chins and both are stylists but Hector had the greater handspeed thats why he ranks higher :p
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    15,217
    Likes Received:
    169
    I'm speechless. One fighter over another 'pound for pound' soley based on handspeed. You need to go back to the drawing board regarding your criteria when ranking fighters.

    Next you'll be telling me Camacho ranks higher because he had smarter shorts than Whitaker. It wouldn't surprise me if you did. :lol:
     
  14. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    331
    Robbi I keep thinking i'm talking to sweet pea with that avatar you got!!

    I like pernell with all his skills. I dont like to say this but his skills were more than enough to embarrass Chavez. But I really dont think he would have been as successful with Hector Camacho. Hector would have have been split seconds faster than him and would pull ahead of him on the scorecards.

    That's how a fight between the two of them in their primes would have gone-honest!
     
  15. lfsdan

    lfsdan Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    528
    Likes Received:
    0
    Monzon without a doubt. One of the top 3 middles of all time surely garnishes him a spot over Whitaker.