Who do you have higher on your p4p list, Wlad or Ward?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cesare-borgia, Feb 28, 2012.


  1. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Wlad, just. But I expect Ward to surpass him in his next two fights.
     
  2. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Exactly WHO has Wlad beaten in those 20 title fights?
     
  3. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    How is Wlad a "dominant fighter" for "a decade and a half" when he's been KTFO'ed THREE times during that time frame?

    Exactly how does that work?
     
  4. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    I got Ward at 6-7 and Wladdy at around 5.
     
  5. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    The case against Ward would be that Wladimir has so many more fights. Ward essentially only has 6 fights at the world level, however they are all very impressive. The following list is my opinion, but it is Wards' six best victories in order with all of Wladimir's fights which are better than Wards' win over Edison Miranda/Allan Green slotted in the appropriate place. This is at glance, don't hold me to it in another 6 months or anything...

    Ward - Kessler
    Ward - Froch
    Klitschko - Byrd I
    Klitschko - Chagaev
    Klitschko - Haye
    Klitschko - Byrd II
    Ward - Abraham
    Klitschko - Chambers
    Ward - Bika
    Klitschko - Ibragimov
    Klitschko - Brewster II
    Ward - Green
    Klitschko - Brock
    Ward - Miranda

    I have Ward #5 and Wladimir #7 in my P4P.

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=373863
     
  6. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004

    Bull**** in the bold.


    Keith
     
  7. keith

    keith ESB OG Full Member

    3,627
    3
    Sep 5, 2004
    Ward easy.

    Has not been ko'd by three journeymen.

    Keith
     
  8. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Ward an is not close. He has a lot more talent in his division an better resume in the last couple of years. A good p4p list is based on resume. Everything else is too subjective. You like Rigo and you think he is p4p 1 ok good for you but he has done **** to prove it so he is outside of the top 10
     
  9. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Keith Wlad has been KOed more than 5 years ago so it doesn't count for the p4p standing at the moment. Ward is better but for other reasons.
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    In a weaker era and weightclass. Ward has better ability and skills pound 4 pound. In the truest sense of the word Ward is the superior fighter on a pound for pound basis. Plenty of people can't handle that and prefer to give it to fighters who are more accomplished or those who have achieved more because it feels less arbitrary and subjective to give credit where credits due, although that's not exactly what P4P is about. Of course you have to prove something. You can't rank journeyman on subjective grounds of seeing star potential. This is an extreme example, obviously. Ward has blossomed and proven his ability. To rate a super-heavyweight dominating in a deprived HW era over the best SMW in one of the better weight-classes distorts the point and meaning of P4P. One guy has a constant size & weight advantage in a weak era. The other just won the SMW tournament, and is arguably the most versatile fighter in the world right now. Anyone who thinks Wlad is the actual better fighter can't properly evaluate talent and ability then.
     
  11. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl Ward is result of the finest Irish sperm !!!
     
  12. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    Because he came back from those defeats with victories over high ranking fighters and fought for and won championship fights. The great Joe Louis in his prime and considered unbeatable got K'oed by over the hill Max Schmelling. Does that defeat mean he was suddenly not a dominant heavyweight fighter at the time. At worst he would be still considered top 5.
    Your logic and ability to measure a fighter is flawed. Few fighters win every fight in their career. It is usually a growth experience where one learns from one's mistakes and improves as Wlad has done in remarkable fashion. He has been undefeated for what 7 years now.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Vlad by far. SOB Ward refused to allow the best 168 lb. fighter in the world to fight in his tournament, also refused to fight in his tournament unless had never had to travel, which he did not! Now he still refuses to fight Bute and he never will. Ward is demanding that Bute fight everyone in the division except himself! Ward is a coward!

    Let Vlad fight Ward ASAP, then we will see who is the better fighter!!!!!!!

    Vlad by knockout!!!!!!!
     
  14. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Ward's simply a more skilled and diversified fighter and unlike Klitschko, he doesn't have the benefit of having huge size advantages.
     
  15. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    Max Schmeling is a better HW than Wladimir Klitschko is, Pound-for-Pound and Era-for-Era. So don't even try to think about that being a relevant counter-statement.

    Corrie Sanders, though I think underrated, is equal to the semi-retired Paulino Uzcudun that Joe Louis beat on. Neither Klitschko has a victory near the caliber of what Schmeling I would have been for Louis. Instead, he went and redeemed the loss by picking up a win which DWARFS any three of the Klitschkos' wins combined.