Who do you rank higher all-time pound-for-pound: Felix Trinidad or Joe Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Oct 23, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Even if you favour one guy over the other, you have to rank these two pretty closely pound-for-pound IMO. I have trouble deciding between the two. I think Calzaghe is possibly the more skilled fighter, but Tito has a stronger resume. I'm interested in how the poll will go on this one...

    ...Please Be Adults And Vote For Who You Genuinely Think Was The Greater Fighter, Not Just Biased Hometown Allegiances.

    Thoughts/opinions? :bbb
     
  2. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Tito.

    Better resume and he continually stepped up and fought the best every division had to offer.

    Just like you said in another post, the Greats fight other Greats.
     
  3. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Tito much better resume than joe by far
     
  4. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Poll open. I expect this to be a close one. I voted Tito, but I'm not 100% on that.
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    True :good
     
  6. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    I got to give it to Tito,better overall opposition,fought everywhere
     
  7. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I go with Tito.
     
  8. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    I'm shocked you chose Tito. hahahah

    How about this, for you PACFAN as well: Tito vs Calzaghe in a head ot head matchup?

    I say Calzaghe wins.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Obviously. Tito never quite made it at 160lbs, and Calzaghe was strong at 168lbs. Calzaghe late stoppage.
     
  10. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    4,237
    336
    Aug 30, 2008
    This was done recently and tito won by something like 46-5.Tito easily for me.
     
  11. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    i'm not hating on Joe i like him and i'm not being biased either but i don't think its close tito always fought the best that was out there. look at the fight with Roy he was out of boxing for 3 years and jumped 2 weight classes to fight roy who he had no business being in the ring with at that time.. an ATG and a true warrior. boxing NEEDS more fighters like Tito
     
  12. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    I meant in a pound for pound sense.
     
  13. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I had already given my answer on the pound-for-pound question, that's what this thread is.
     
  14. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Ok, but just because I think Tito is better pound for pound in terms of rankings, doesn't automatically mean I have him winning a pfp head to head fight.

    Tito is better in terms of rankings pfp but Joe wins the pfp head to head fight IMO.
     
  15. joejab

    joejab Thread Killa Full Member

    1,076
    0
    May 31, 2007
    I picked Calzaghe, but then I realized I diddn't follow or study Tito's career, oh well :censored it.