Who do you rank higher ATG? Hopkins or Pacquiao

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by safc1990, Jun 8, 2009.


  1. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005

    A 1 handed jones dominated Hopkins. Pac has never been dominated, he got KO'd twice on both fights he was winning due to his weight problems.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
  3. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
  4. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I agree that Pacquiao should be higher, but that is a ****ing bull**** reason.

    Tarver and Trinidad were easily as good as Taylor, Pavlik and Wright were clearly better. Pavlik and Tarver were bigger than Taylor, and Trinidad and Wright successfully competed at the same weight as Taylor. Also, I rank Trinidad and Wright higher than Calzaghe in all-time pound-for-pound terms. Also, mentioning Jones is meaningless. 1993-2003 he would've beaten almost anyone in history at those weights.

    You're a good poster mate, but that was woeful.
     
  5. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Hopkins opposition at MW is deplorable. The fact that he was MW champ for 12 years and only defended it 20 times shows he's only fought less than 2X a year. And with the way he fights, no wonder he reigned that long :roll::patsch

    Losing to Taylor is prolly the greatest single thing that happened to Hopkins because it made him move up and be a lesser ***** in negotiating fights.
     
  6. HeavyT

    HeavyT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,709
    19
    Feb 9, 2009
    Really close, BHop for now, Pac will msot likely surprass him.
     
  7. Powerman55

    Powerman55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,295
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    Hopkins beat smaller men in De La Hoya and Trinidad. Hell even Pavlik was coming up in weight to beat him. Pac is fighting bigger men.

    Hopkins lost his biggest and most important fights against Taylor, Jones Jr and Calzaghe. If he'd won those then he has a better resume than Manny.

    Also take into account that Manny lays it all on the line and fights to win, whereas Hopkins is highly defensive, that's why he's never been decisively beaten – because how do you beat someone who doesn't come to fight?

    Saying Hopkins resume beats Pac's is insane.
     
  8. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    PACMAN shits all over hopkins..

    Pacman.. It's not even debatable.
     
  9. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    hopkins lost twice to taylor....rarely do you see a ATG lost twice in a row...

    but hopkins stock would go up if pavlik would be an ATG in the future
     
  10. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Pacman . . . it is.
     
  11. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    i would say pacquiao has the bigger heart...hopkins refuse to move up and earn his way into a rematch with jones
     
  12. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    1,016
    2
    Apr 25, 2009
  13. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    close. a good argument can be made for both sides, made harder due to the fact both are still active.
     
  14. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Pac will be sorely missed when he's gone. The excitement he brings to the sport is invaluable.

    On the other hand, I can't wait for Hopkins to retire. He is just there to spoil great matches. If he'd not been around, we'd already seen Pavlik-Calzaghe, a sure action-packed fight.
     
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I like Hopkins as a middleweight, but Pac overall appears to be better.