Who do you rank higher in all-time terms: Tito Ortiz or Rampage Jackson?

No, he didn't. I was thinking of Wanderlei's slam of Sakuraba while rationalizing that post, and added the name by mistake.

 

I change my vote to Rampage. Youse guys are right.

 

Rampage by light year.

 

Before he lost to Chuck... I would have probablly gone for Tito.... but 2 years of sitting on his ass has made Rampage a better fighter and given him the edge.

 

rampage was a ****ing legend in PRIDE. "miss pride" but to facts rampage has fought better competition facing fighters in their prime such as shogun, wanderlei x2, kevin randleman, murilo ninja rua and fighters such as lyoto machida, dan henderson, chuck liddell, ricardo arona, sakuraba and igor which are bigger names and harder fighters imo as they have a vast range degrees of fighters such as wrestlers, bjj specialists and devasting strikers name top 10 fighters that tito beat better than those that rampage has beat.

 

Very close but I give it to Rampage, people forget how good Tito was pre Chuck but I still give the nod to Rampage even taking this on board.

 

People forget Rampages level of competition and quality of wins. Have a look at wikipedia and this argument is dead.

 

rampage end of story....close thread

 

I voted tito just because he was a champion for a while. He was the face of ufc before liddell whoop his ass. Rampage was only able to defend the title once then he lost.

Rampage do have a better resume.

 

:good

 

Rampage !!!!

Its not even close