Who do you rate higher as an ATG: Tyson, Lewis or Holyfield?

Kinda like "**** off" is an invitation, right.

Can't i convince you to put Jeffries lower? To put it crude, his biggest wins are over 36 and 38 year old supermiddle- and cruiserweights, in a time when one's career was usually over in the early 30's. He did overcome adversity early in his career but his opposition (for a heavyweight, not in a p4p sense) wasn't all that.

 

Evander Holyfield

 

Why do people rank LL so high ? Most of his wins came against opponents that were already beat by Tyson or Holy with some few exceptions but its not like they were his rivals ..Hell his biggest rivals may have been Bruno and Bowe but Bowe I think was too scared of LL and Bruno well Tyson already beat him by the time LL foght him no ??

 

i can't beleive there's not that many votes for holyfield. holyfield's achievments at cruiserweight and haveyweight combined def put him ahead of lewis in all time pound for pound frankings but lewis was a slightly better heavyweight.

 

Lennox Lewis at the top.

 

Lewis! :deal

He beat all the fighters he has fought in the ring. Yes he lost some . . . but he rematched them and beat them to the ground before he retired.

 

Holyfield by a fair margin.

We're talking p4p here. Lewis had a huge size advantage on Holyfield.

 

Nopes . . . the thread title says ATG not P4P.

 

Tyson with Rooney on his side would of licked them both.

 

This one is easy...

Evander first,
Then Mike Tyson a close second,

and Lennox Lewis a not as close third.

All that know and remember the history of all the fighters, and weigh everything, know that there is no other way but this order.

 

I feel like I've seen this a thousand times, and the clear answer is that Holyfield is higher on a P4P basis, but Lewis was greater in terms of heavyweights. Any other answer is hating.

 

Evander Holyfield

 

Lewis
Holyfield
Tyson

 

Lewis

Tyson shouldnt be an ATG