Who do you rate higher: De La Hoya, Mosley or Trinidad?

co sign this. i thought that dlh schooled tito for a good 8 rounds. titos blood was all over dlh shorts.

mosley had some rough patches in his career but never went as far as fighting someone like hopkins.

 

He lost to Mosley and that counts for something..Beside we dont know how Oscar would have faired vs Wright or Forrest. I for one am pretty damn sure that Wink would have beat Oscar. And a prime forrest would have likely beat Oscar, but I give Oscar a better shot at winning then vs Wink.

 

Champions fought Mosley 4???? Om lets see...Forrest 1, Wright 2, Oscar 3, Margo 4, Cotto 5. There are more but that shows that your little thing here is totally biased from the biggest DLH sackswinger of all times. Also Mosley had 22 title fights, Shane also fought 8 fights vs p4p fighters and 10 if you count fighters that were at one point p4p top 10

 

Shane also fought the higher risk fighters. Four of Shanes 5 loses came vs fighters that Oscar ducked and one that beat the tar out of tito.

 

oscar, tito then mosley.

 

It's really hard but i would have to go with Felix Trinidad. I think he should have stayed retired after his last fight with hacine cherifi. He would have been fine at that time with only 1 loss against the best middleweight in bernard hopkins.

Trinidad was moving up in weight and beating anybody they put infront of him.
Camacho-Campas-Carr-Whitaker-Delahoya-Reid-Vargas-Joppy then he ran into hopkins.

 

:huh..Really that list of fighters arent that impressive when you think that Pea and Camacho were old, and past it. Reid and Vargas had like 30 fights between the two when they fought Tito, and he didnt really beat Oscar.

 

Meaningless!

 

Yeah because they arent true

 

You got only one problem there douchebag, De La Hoya didn't beat Mosley, he lost. Did you forget that? If fact he lost twice.

 

Your a biased homo...your DeLaBitchass retired...quite this ridiculous nutt-hugging. It's embarassing and offensive.

This is all over the place contradictory.

It was a meanful loss because it was at his best weight. He made all the demands for the fight. And he was fighting the smaller man. It was a pretty bad loss.

You talk about being robbed in the second Mosley fight and in the Trinidad fight, but ignore the Whittiker, Sturm, and Quartey fight...all close but clear (Sturm was highway robbery). Cmon bro.

Dont make arguments about robberies. Cuz those can be argued as robberies as well.

I voted Mosley because of his excellence at 135. Beating THE man in Oscar @ 147. And recently pounding the **** outta Margarito. The man many people refused to fight and never looked impressive beating. Not to mention the relevant fact that he beat the **** outta Margo at the age of 37. Something Oscar and Tito are incapable of doing at anywhere near that age.

And Mosley's career isn't over yet. We'll see what happens...but my guess is that Mosley has about one or two more good fights left in him.

 

De La Hoya, he fought harder fights.. he fought them all.

+ he got robbed against Trinidad in a fight that he won and he beat Mosely in the 2nd fight. 2 robberies.

 

No. But does the intent of the comment truly escape you ?

It was made in direct response to...

You mention that Mosley lost twice to Wright and Forrest. I merely mention that Oscar didn't fight them, so we dont't know how HE would have done against them.




(IMO, he would have beaten Forrest, and he was probably fortunate not to have faced Winky).