Who do you rate higher p4p? Duran or Griffith?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MrOliverKlozoff, May 14, 2011.


Page 3 of 3
  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,446
    21,870
    Sep 15, 2009
    wow, you reckon?
     
    lufcrazy, May 16, 2011
    lufcrazy, May 16, 2011
    #31
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,100
    Jan 4, 2008
    I do, mate. Physical phenomens usually have at least some technical flaws (yes, this even applies to Robinson) because of the simple fact that they can get away with them, but Duran had almost picture perfect technique. For someone with his speed, power, strength and stamina, this is truly rare.
     
    Bokaj, May 16, 2011
    Bokaj, May 16, 2011
    #32
  3. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Duran ranks higher.
     
    JAB5239, May 17, 2011
    JAB5239, May 17, 2011
    #33
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Griffith was great.I just believe Duran was better.What about a head to head at 147?
     
    Clinton, May 17, 2011
    Clinton, May 17, 2011
    #34
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    Head to head at 147 or 160 Griffith beats Duran..this would be where reality would happen. Griffith W15 Duran.:deal
     
    red cobra, May 17, 2011
    red cobra, May 17, 2011
    #35
Page 3 of 3