Who do you rate more highly: B-Hop, FMJ or Pac-Man?

Pac is a good fighter but also a fortunate one who came along at the right place at the right time..

 

So Hopkins isnt fortunate that the great fighters of his era who he made his name of were natural WW's? DLH arguably lost to Sturm and was too small, Tito has been outboxed handily by ODLH & Winky, iron chin bigger man hopkins has the biggest stylistic advantage over him. Winky again was overweight and came up in weight. Pac gets critisized for loosing to Morales, BHop lost to Taylor twice! Pavlik went up in weight too.

Atleast Pac came up in weight to fight MAB who was on top of his game and fought a prime JMM. I like how you can heavily critisize Pac's resume but give Hopkins a free pass. lol.

 

dude finito is a marquez lover that's why he criticize pac in every way. The dude hates pac so much that he even talks about how he dress like a pornstar:rofl.

 

Winning over a ligitimate WW champ is close to impossible for one who started pro boxing at 106 lb. IMO, the welter is too much of a stretch for Pac, I would not even allow him to fight Cotto or Mosley as those guys are simply too big and too strong for him aside from having elite skills like Pac himself. I think winning Hatton's 140 belt and if he could unify it or even the 135 lb, it should be enough to rank him higher than Floyd and B-Hop.

 

Hopkins
PBF




Pac

 

well put.

 

hop, pac, fmj

 

its Pac. When Pac will be old and shot or retired, his stock will skyrocket

 

Hopkins - current P4P #1 - top 25 all time

 

Floyd
Pacquiao
Hopkins (greatest wins, de la hoya and trinidad, smaller guys, tarver after losing a lot of weight, who else? meh)

 

Pavlik- was a great win
He was the middleweight champion of the world for a long time. He defended it what 20X. That's pretty impressive.

 

You forgot Pavlik and Winky Wright.

Hopkins' wins are better than PBF's

 

Winky is smaller too? Pavlik is a good win, only because of how old he is. ONLY.

 

del

 

Broken record