Who does Fury have to beat....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by wellsini, Dec 22, 2015.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    It's the truth.
     
  2. wellsini

    wellsini Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,266
    16
    Jul 6, 2009
     
  3. Zodius

    Zodius Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    19
    Dec 13, 2015
    Only inside your tiny mind

    In reality Fury is miles better in every department

    Would Rahman ko fury ?

    Never

    Would fury struggle with fighters as limited as Ray mercer ?

    No way

    He is superior to lummox in every aspect

    LL didn't even wanna fight john fury and John fury wasn't even that good
     
  4. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
     
  5. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012
    I think we're going to go back to the ABC days if he beats Wlad again as Wlad will defo get a crack at the IBF holder. Beyonce will keep fighting stiffs until Povetkin comes along. Fury might have to fight rOidtiz and Roidshua because Beyonce or Povetkin probably wont fancy it, and Wlad will have a couple of B class farewells on the IBF strap, if he loses again to Fury that is. I could actually see Fury dropping the WBO strap so one of these pedheads can claim to be champ and he can have more WBA bouts on SBO.
     
  6. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    It's no just about who you beat, but also about how you did it. You can't expect to get loads of credit beating a guy who does nothing by doing slightly more than nothing.

    Having said that I do feel like Fury gets a lot more credit today than he did before that fight. And now the door is wide open for him to prove himself moving forward. For me, he just hasn't shown me much. yet.
     
  7. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    He has to actually beat Wlad. They basically feinted for 12 rounds.
     
  8. Zodius

    Zodius Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    19
    Dec 13, 2015
    Stop talking rubbish
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    That fight was garbage. Both men looked ridiculous. Fury looked stupid and Wlad looked lost. Maybe it's irrelevant, idk, because I still gave Fury the victory. Kind of by default though...
     
  10. Zodius

    Zodius Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    19
    Dec 13, 2015
    Fury outjabbed him, was landing left and right hooks and wlad cut himself up trying to lead with the head

    It was a tactical masterpiece and fury showed himself to be the superior boxer
     
  11. Dementia Pugulistica

    Dementia Pugulistica Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,090
    1,251
    Nov 24, 2005
    Good talk. Comments like that really help people understand your point of view and help to foster a meaningful discussion. I know you will keep it up.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ideally, Wilder, Povetkin, Pulev and Ortiz.
     
  13. twopiece

    twopiece Pugilistic Ambassador Full Member

    5,613
    336
    Sep 28, 2007
    I honestly think he just had to beat Wlad again. Wlad shouldn't be getting written off so soon in my opinion.
     
  14. jdw2000

    jdw2000 Active Member Full Member

    1,226
    39
    Oct 16, 2014
    Tyson himself admits the HW division is $hit.
     
  15. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    83
    Aug 23, 2013
    he ducked his way to a title shot. his defenses (should he beat klitschko again) will be on par with wilders.