Who else would have lost their ass if you could bet on a robbery?

I would have stopped watching boxing if AJ got that decision, that Cambell Hatton decision was even wore though, one of the judges for the Usyk v AJ fight was Ukranian, Usyk`s camp insisted on that, which stupid judge had it 115-113?

 

When the 117-111 was read out I knew we'd have a deserved winner. However you never know with boxing... earlier on a judge scored 99-91 to Prodan.


The fight was a 117-111 at best for AJ
I had it 118-110

 

There was no way they could have given that to AJ, even at the final bell which was 5 seconds early while AJ looked out on his feet, AJ slumped on his stool and stayed there, pulling faces, whincing, breathing so so heavy.

AJ was outboxed, he was at times schooled and it's a strong word but he was exposed.. it was a comprehensive win for Usyk, even the most bias AJ fan knew he lost at that final bell.

But I thought the same earlier in the night after seeing Campbell Hatton lose 5 of 6 rounds rather clearly and still get a decision.

Campbell Hatton is a lucky man, because AJ losing has taken the attention away from one of the worse decisions I've seen for a very long time.

Don't get me wrong, I've seen far worse, but I can't remember one that bad for a while, but as usual nothing will be said or done.

Hearns response was "Campbell was very lucky, I've told Ricky and Matthew they should make the rematch with Martinez.."

The BBBofC will ignore it completely, or even if they do have a word with the ref, they will be satisfied with his answers.