Who fought better against Valuev, Holyfield or Haye?

Understood:good

 

The truth is,Valuev should have been out of the picture because Holy should`ve took his belt as he deserved it then would`ve fought Haye to defend it.That would`ve been a good fight.

 

I'm a fan of Haye, but I actually have doubts that he can beat a 47 year old Holyfield !
It's sad how bad heavyweights have become.

 

People forget that valuev admitted he went easy on Holy as he was afraid of hurting him. he wanted to take Haye's head off. If Holy was younger fighting Valuev he would have still won, but Valuev would have also fought much better. I believe haye performed better because Valuev was 100% against him.

May i also say im a massive Holyfield fan and if him and David met prime for Prime, as much as i like Haye i would favour Holfield by UD or late TKO. Peace.

 

The poll shows how stupid some ESBers can be . . .

yeah Holyfield fought better . . . is that why but he ****i'n lost? :deal

:rofl :rofl :rofl

 

Holyfield by miles

 

Lets face is Holyfield beat this man clearly, the reason they didnt give him the title is simple, Evander would have sought out unifying so in order to save Holyfield from himself they robbed him...

 

12th rd.

nuff said.

 

Valuev fought poor in both fights. I dont care what excuses he used for the Holyfield one, he fought the same way against Haye !

 

Holyfield, by a country mile. He actually fought.

 

Holyfield.

I had Haye winning, by default almost. Valuev didn't land anything.

I know it sounds real silly, but I would make Evander a live dog against Haye, even now.

 

Holyfield..!!!!!

 

I was going to make a topic about this..

But thought..

No..