Who fought the better version of Hopkins RJJ or Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Will, Dec 23, 2009.


  1. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Furry Muff!

    Will = big morello fan!
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yep, Tom Morello is a sick guitarist.
     
  3. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Bloody hell. Might have to Frame that post!

    First time agreement!:happy
     
  4. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    :good:smoke
     
  5. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Jones would have spanked him whenever he wanted and Hopkins won the fight between them anyway. At 168 he would have beaten him and the middlewight version of Hopkins was superb. He's adapted well as he's come through the weights thats all he's not necessarily a better fighter just more awkward now as he doesn'y have power. The version of Hopkins wins at 160/168/and won at 175
     
  6. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Completely disagree but you're entitled to your opinion!
     
  7. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    :lol:

    Well I never :good
     
  8. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Workrate and activity played a large part in JCs win over Hopkins, he way well have struggled if he'd have fought a younger Hopkins and those advantages were taken away.
     
  9. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    We'll agree on something one day.

    Just not JC:hi:
     
  10. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
  11. draw99

    draw99 Active Member Full Member

    719
    0
    Apr 7, 2008
    I think its a good question, Will!

    I havent seen the RJJ-Hopkins fight so cant really comment unfortunatly!

    But I am a Calzaghe hater (although I'm not one of those people that think he lost the Hopkins fight). Cannot stand his slapping. Its embarrasing to watch him fight, quite frankly.

    And my opinion on his beloved resume is bums & 2 OAPs, and it looks worse as his greatest victories have been against fighters who have subsequently been proven to be well overated.

    Rant over.
     
  12. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    It is a good and intriging question. It seems to easy to assume the young Hopkins was way better but its not that simple. Hopkins best win up until when he fought Roy Jones was over a guy called Wayne Powell for the USBA middleweight title. He had not built up that experience, ring craft and confidence of all the middleweight title defences.
     
  13. Brit Sillynanny

    Brit Sillynanny Cold Hard Truth Full Member

    2,653
    4
    May 1, 2009
    In the aggregate, Roy definitely fought the better version.

    Bernard Hopkins was a complete fighter that would have been the IBF champ eighteen months earlier if he had not had Roy Jones Jr. across the ring from him (in '93). The 28 1/2 year old Hopkins was materially the same fighter that at almost 30 years of age first becomes the IBF middleweight champ (and then holds it for the next decade).

    Bernard was in his physical prime in the Jones fight and was the same fighter almost to his mid-30s. He brought the same ring generalship into ALL of the fights across the mid and late 90s (including the 1st Mercado fight as so many who didn't watch the fight seem to want to suggest this was some poor performance or he was a different (less accomplished) fighter at this point in time).

    Bernard was past his physical prime before he even got to Trinidad (when he was pushing 37 years).

    One shouldn't ignore a few things about the (this) ending run in Bernard's career. First, the natural tendency when we age is to add some weight sustaining power and compensating for comparatively reduced quickness, agility, and reflexes. Bernard remained at middleweight into old age for many fights (including Trinidad) when he was obviously WEAKER than in his physical prime.

    A physically strong Hopkins from several years earlier would have wrecked the ex-light welter & welter Trinidad with much more dispatch.

    Bernard fought two tough fights with a much less talented boxer/fighter in (prime) Jermain Taylor at 40. He struggled against a fighter he would have dominated in his prime. He deserves credit for taking that fight against a much younger man - in Jermain's prime - his legacy required it.

    Then, at 41 1/2, he moved up to LHW and caught an overweight/weight dropping 38 year old Tarver and got a credible win. There is no doubt he took that fight seriously as he was moving up a couple divisions for the first time to fight a solid (but also aging) champ and felt better finally being able to add pounds to his frame.

    Then, instead of putting a stamp upon his (long overdue) arrival to the LHW division by facing a young, prime LHW he took a path that is understandable - if you are middle aged - and not surprising - if you are old enough to have a career and/or an education. It is also consistent with the choices and business decisions he was making for ALL of these years post prime.

    Bernard chose to fight a worn, small, Winky Wright (a great 154-lb fighter but also a past peak 36 year old with nearly 60 fights on his odometer) - making Wright move up to face Bernard in his first fight above 160.

    Next, similarly, instead of facing a young legit prime LHW, he chose to meet the 36 year old SMW champ (conqueror of nobodies, struggled against many, who had only the domination of an overwhelmed muscle-bound Jeff Lacy on his gaudy ledger and a clear but competitive win over the rigid, stiff, one-dimensional Dane) figuring he would be an easy pushover. But, like any middle-aged athlete can attest, one problem with being past peak is you occasionally have poor performances though it remains possible (for a while) to "turn back the clock" on a given night as well. After an embarrassingly poor performance against an often amateurish looking Calzaghe - who Bernard clearly overlooked - he had little choice but to seek redemption (or retire).

    After that performance he surely wasn't going to finally decide to step up and face a young, prime legit LHW (when he hadn't done it before). So, he gets the current middleweight champ to move up (like Winky did) ten pounds for his first fight at the higher weight.

    Bernard did finally choose a young man in his prime. However, it is a slow-footed, limited, one dimensional athlete along the lines of a Kessler. There is some risk of the unknown but it is tempered with KP's middle-America following which generates some reward/remuneration as a necessary cushion if the old man again turns up old on the night. Bernard makes sure his conditioning is better (than against Joe) and is ready to move from the get go. Fortunately, he gets off well, builds momentum and confidence, and closes Pavlik out schooling him in the process.

    Fast forward and Bernard is talking about young prime fighters (Adamek, Dawson, etc., etc.) with talent but angling to re-meet an old worn nemesis of 40 years. A fighter who was left twitching and unconscious by two aging but solid LHWs (Johnson & Tarver) in 2004/2005 - before being chosen as an opponent by brave Joe THREE years after that.

    The point is that Bernard has been doing a bit of a smoke and mirrors routine because the man is now ANCIENT in boxing terms. There is no denying that these decision are necessary not merely financially sensible/understandable.

    If Bernard was throwing himself in the ring with young, prime active athletes he would be taking punishment. The same way he used to deal out punishment in his prime. It is absurd to believe that the version of BHOP that fought Joe at past 43 years of age is somehow comparable to a physically prime version due to some "mental evolution" to ring wizard.

    Time catches up to everyone. It is the great equalizer. It just comes at different times and/or can be hastened by not taking care of oneself or meeting the wrong opponent (facing top-notch comp repeatedly from one's youth will do you in as well).

    Fighters can't get to middle age or old age in pristine condition by facing the toughest comp repeatedly or regularly (and Bernard picked his opponents carefully once he got to middle age - Calz has been doing it since being unable to avoid getting caught by clean right hands to his grill from tired and faded Chris Eubank) - no one is that far above everyone else.

    Bernard is a conditioning marvel. [Joe is pretty good too.]


    As OLD Bernard ends his career he has been sticking to old fighters and/or slow handed/footed fighters (as well as not chasing after any prime legit LHWs) - to avoid problems. This isn't "ring generalship". This is wise matchmaking. Joe could corroborate the effectiveness of that approach as well.


    It is a fallacy and a myth that Bernard was some green fighter in '93 and materially different in anything other than his physical quickness, reflexive capabilities, and stamina by '08 (A-G-E). Bernard was at Graterford where he learned well how to fight and his ring maturity is evident early - though he started as a pro only late-ish - not late - he just didn't have the typical amateur career - he got his fighting in prison for nearly five years.

    He was no ring novice against RJJ. He just faced a superb talent. Eighteen months later he was IBF champ and remained so for the next decade.

    He was far, far, far past prime for Calz in 2008. The optimal combination of relative youth, maturity, athleticism, and ring experience was passed before the Trinidad fight (that balance between fighting peak and physical prime). He has remained at a high enough level that some remain confused by what they see - some of that is because the great young athletes have abandoned any interest in boxing for a few generations now.

    That said, in a time machine, Bernard breaks Joe down and finishes him prime for prime. Add eight pounds of muscle to prime Bernard and you can pick your version of Joe. Bernard is too tough and gets there first with the punches that matter. Same thing for James Toney and Joe. Same thing for RJJ. Same thing for another dozen guys (dozens).


    And Morello is good .. but he's sure not very cool looking :D
     
  14. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    There was a long thread in he General on this, I cant find it now though.

    I'd go for the version that Roy beat
     
  15. anjawnaymiz

    anjawnaymiz Can we get Ivan Dychko some momentum Full Member

    8,263
    6,073
    Sep 6, 2008
    i'd go with calzaghe, the hopkins jones jr fought was far too green bearing in mind that was early 90s and hopkins prime was'nt until say 2001-2004?

    that extra weight definatly did hopkins a few favours against joe.

    its 60-40 in favour of the 2008 version of hopkins for me.