Who had faster hands? Calzaghe or Benn?

he had jumpeddown 2 divisions in 2 weeks, he wasnt fit to fight at smw. the restof the evidence dictates that joe is featherfist.

 

joe was easy to hit, thats not true. He was only an issue for those untrained wiht southpaws

 

Joe by a mile

 

Toney stops Benn and UD's Eubank all day every day. Had the chin to take Benn's best and the skill to **** all over him, Eubank has the chin and skill to compete but the winner is obvious at the end

 

He did, but he had a tendency to brawl, that's not a good plan against those two. But yes he beats both

 

You think ?? Toney could brawl with Benn and still come out on top imo, the gulf for me is huge, he could really f Benn up, after 3/4 rounds at 160, Toney absolutely plays with him, all over by the 8th or maybe sooner..Just my opinion though

 

I should think that if theres one man you dont brawl with,its Nigel Benn, its commonsense.

 

When you have Toney's skills its possible. If Benn genuinely hurt Toney, Toney would start to work him, he'd take it as an insult. If Benn had more movement to his game leg wise he'd last longer but hes only robust and tough for half a dozen rounds at 160, he became vulnerable and could be hurt, his pacing wasn't the best, he calmed down and boxed more at 168 but the power wasn't the same. That said, Toney had problems making weight at 160, he could be flat at times, but all the Americans back then, Nunn Toney Jones Jnr etc were blatantly another level to Benn and Eubank

 

HYou know what Mark I could trot out the old line "Styles make....." , you know the rest it no I'll be honest wit you Mark. I was having a bit of fun wit George & I'm sure George knew that bit of fun. Benn was a master blaster @the weight one better & has to be Da Hawk..now that boy could punch . neither were great boxers though imo.
My main point was how disappointed I was wit Eubanks &Benn @not taking the challenge of Toney or Nunn in their prime!
Keep em coming Mark ,all good fun baby