Who had more power Hagler or Leonard?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Sep 12, 2012.


  1. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    Most would probobly say hagler,but then again he was sort of an accumulation type of puncher,but Leonard had some pretty nastly kos even in the upper weights where Hagler never ventured. Hearns had more power than both.
     
  2. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    I say Hagler, but Leonard did have some pretty impressive power.
     
  3. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Leonard had the speed, but Haglar had the power.
     
  4. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,432
    32
    Dec 18, 2011
    leonard had more "snap" at times and some solid knockouts but hagler was an all time great hitter when he sat on his punches
     
  5. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,233
    2,420
    Mar 26, 2005
    Marvin...of course...
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    Hagler had more power through being naturally bigger, p4p I might give it to Leonard.... maybe :think
     
  7. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    Leonard scored a few more impressive looking KO's, but that was likely due to his superior speed and combination punching more so than pure power. Both were very good, solid hitters but nothing devastating a la Hearns. I do think Leonard was a bit more capable of ending or changing a fight in an instant than Marv.
     
  8. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Both often underestimated punchers.

    leonard was vicious with his punches at 147 and seemed to carry his power well up in weight too.
     
  9. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    495
    Jan 28, 2007
    Hagler had more pure power. He was definitely the more heavy handed fighter, but Leonard was the sharper puncher.
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,021
    11,056
    Jan 6, 2007
    Leonard has exactly ONE fight "where Hagler never ventured."

    Donny Lalonde.

    And he forced this LHW to weight drain to 168 to artificially have two weight-class titles on the line.




    Leonard was the more skillful boxer.

    Hagler was clearly the harder hitter.
     
  11. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Hagler definitely. Marvin was naturally bigger and almost always got his foe out sooner or later.
    Leonard's power was more velocity-based.
     
  12. babaluma

    babaluma Member Full Member

    278
    1
    Mar 29, 2012
    Leonard seems to have the more dramatic power, apart from vs Hearns Hagler tended to grind opponents down. Leonard threw punches out of nowhere and his KO of Hearns shows his explosive one punch power. he had a few fights where he turned it around with a sudden blow.
     
  13. FastHands(beeb)

    FastHands(beeb) Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    407
    Oct 28, 2010
    Leonard had snappy, the-punch-you-don't-see-takes-you-out kind of power, Hagler was the heavier hitter imo. I also think Hagler had the nore long-term damaging kind of power too, many men were not the same after fighting Marvin.

    Often overlooked with Marvin is that he also had that "cutting" power, he was a slashing puncher; look at Minter, Vito, Hamsho and Sibson. Minter & Vito were bleeders before they fought Marvin, not sure about Hamsho, but Sibbo was not known as a bleeder until, and after, he fought Hagler.
     
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,076
    8,463
    Jul 17, 2009

    Tallies with my own opinion.
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,378
    9,302
    Jul 15, 2008