Who had more Power? Julian Jackson or Tommy hearns

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Medicine, Sep 6, 2009.


  1. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Usually I feel a need to argue my point with all the other posts,but amazingly I agreed with every single posts on this thread:thumbsupSo I feel no need to leave my opinion,cuz id just be repeating what was already said:thumbsup GREAT POSTS AND THREAD!
     
  2. zorryt

    zorryt Active Member Full Member

    762
    0
    Mar 21, 2009
    Julian Jakson of course.
     
  3. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,895
    2,606
    Mar 24, 2005
    :lol:

    you had me at def
     
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hearns at Welter. He had leverage and could set his punches up, but JJ had a more powerful raw power.
     
  5. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Cannot really answer this, one way or the other. Jackson had a heavy thumping concussive punch - Hearns freaky power was combined with leverage and speed. The way Hearns threw a knockout punch was quite unique.
     
  6. curly

    curly Fastest hands in the West Full Member

    2,007
    1
    Nov 29, 2008
    The Hawk. Some of his victims looks like the have fallen into a coma.
     
  7. Chinny

    Chinny Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,611
    1
    Aug 10, 2007
    Good question but the level of competition they KO'd was so different.

    Roberto Duran had never been close to Ko'd and Hearns did that to him? Unreal.

    When Jackson went up in competition (vs Mccallum or Mcclellan) he couldn't knock his man out*.

    * Terry Norris excluded, but he didn't have a sturdy chin
     
  8. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    julian jackson a proper put you to sleep knock out artist....:tired:tired