Who had more skill? Joe Louis or Wlad Klitschko?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Jan 14, 2019.


Who had more skill? Joe Louis or Wlad Klitschko?

  1. Joe Louis

    55 vote(s)
    82.1%
  2. Wlad Klitschko

    6 vote(s)
    9.0%
  3. About even

    6 vote(s)
    9.0%
  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Wlad was 39 for Fury. When you have an all time jab, right and hook, and mix it in with good footwork and defense you have little need for in-fighting, instead Wlad became a top clincher when he wanted to do it, which is also a skill.

    Saying he won because he was big doesn't wash because many of his opponents were also big, some heavier than he was! Are you saying size is a big factor at heavyweight? Clarification is needed.

    Yes, Wlad style would work at light heavyweight. Might you say its not all that different than Bob Foster's with the jab and missile of a right hand?

    But you did not answer my question. Wlad went ten years of winning without needed a come from behind KO or a favorable call on the cards. That is Joe Louis. As for the opponents that I mentioned that outboxed Louis they lost on points, something Wlad didn't until he was age 39.

    As I stated before he was #1 pound for pound for a while by Ring Magazine, which is based on skills. I don't think you can argue it with details, as the facts pretty much side with me.
     
    Seamus likes this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,890
    47,876
    Mar 21, 2007
    Wlad was extremely good at what he did. At what he did. At what he did he was 99/100. But people get confused. Because it is extremely effective doesn't mean he's extremely skillful. Wlad absolutely mastered a portion of boxing. But he's very clearly the less skillful of the two. Very, very clearly.
     
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    Was his clinching as good as Jack Johnson's?
     
  4. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,244
    Oct 30, 2016
    Its about even .

    Louis put punches together better but Wlad had better technique all around minus body punching. One has to remember Louis wore little gloves to and weighed 200 in his prime , not exactly a fair comparison since Wlad was 240 at his peak which really is another weight class where lighter guys do punch a little more fluidly.

    If I added footwork and defense Wlad gets the nod. Wlad is extremely underatted ,I guess another 20 years around here maybe he'll get a little more credit? Maybe. He may be coming back as well so??????
     
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    Constantly hugging and back humping was done to compensate for a chronic skill deficiency in certain area's. Wlad didn't fight in close quarters because he couldn't. No more to it than that
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    What legal defense did Wlad have apart from frantically waving his arms about in the air? Fury rightfully stated on the Joe Rogan podcast that Wlad had no defense at all. Thats why he had to resort to constantly jumping down on guys backs.

    A one dimensional guy simply can't be on even terms with a multi dimensional guy. Learn the sport fartman. Aren't you the guy who claimed Karl Milenburger folded Ali in half with a body shot??:nut::nut:
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,357
    45,777
    Feb 11, 2005
    Did Wlado get to grapple the equivalent of Tommy Burns or Ketchel?
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  8. Reason123

    Reason123 Not here for the science fiction. Full Member

    1,113
    270
    Jul 27, 2015
    Might as well been half the time.
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    Byrd.
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    he was extremely underrated getting koed by bums serially that wouldnt figure on anyone elses "title reign"

    give me a break. wlad is bottom end of the atg list if hes ever on it. Louis is top.
     
  11. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Wlad would not need to cllinch Burns, Ketchel or Flynn. Each man would be out inside of four rounds, but to answer you question Johnson often got a away with hitting and holding, hitting on the break, and low blows. In some fights, holding and hitting was allowed, Johnson just bent the rule, and made it a foundation of his game.

    In terms of locking up his man, Wlad all the way. Johnson's clinching worked really well vs small men, but we seen none of it vs Willard or Moran. Wlad was a technical clincher with long arms, lock down power and 240+ pounds of weight to wear his man down, if he wanted to.

    I'd say Wlad's the better clincher.
     
  12. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    Clinching isn't a tactic to be commended in any way. . I just wanted to expose your double standards but i thought you'd have the foresight to avoid the question.
    But while im here , Johnson was by far a better clincher since he fought in and out of the clinch , like you are supposed to.

    Opening up and fighting in the clinch gives the opponent more opportunities to connect , but Wlads opponents didn't get that opportunity because his octopus grab was designed to shut down all offence in close , including his own.

    Wlads grabbing tactics were an act of cowardice and he committed them to disguise and compensate for glaring weaknesses . We grade guys for being skillful boxers , not skillful cheaters.
     
  13. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Well you must hate Ali then. Not only did he clinch, he held behind the head. Wlad fought on his terms. Johnson cliched small men that did not have a lot of skill. That impressed you? Wlad was a skilled clincher, as anyone.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,550
    27,174
    Feb 15, 2006
    Louis could have been 100 when he lost a figth, and you would not make any allowance for it!
    Can you name any light heavyweight who was successful at world level without some sort of inside game?
    His opponents were either good fighters who he had some sort of physical advantage over, or mediocre ones who he did not have some sort of size advantage over.

    Yes a large portion of his success was down to being big.
    Not especially, but even if we accept the example of Bob Foster, he clearly had a significant height and reach advantage over most of his opponents.

    Take away that, and Wlad is not particularly good.
    If Wlad had been the size of Louis, then some of Louis's opponents would have clowned him.

    Being very good at doing one thing, that relies very heavily on having physical advantages, does not make you a technically complete fighter.

    It just makes you very good at doing one thing!
    It is based on results, and even if it wasn't, it would just be an opinion.
     
  15. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,033
    23,460
    Jul 21, 2012
    Measures were taken to prevent Ali from holding the back of Fraziers head in the rubber match. Even the Filipino government got involved to make sure it would be a clean fight.
    The result was one of the greatest bouts of all time in which Ali won. That and allowing Foreman to punch himself out on his body and head are some of the reasons that separate Ali from Wlad.

    Imagine Wlad laying on the ropes and letting Foreman tee off on him. He would last seconds , never mind rounds.

    What measures were taken to prevent Wlad from ocapussing Peter second time around ? He committed worse illegal clinching for the rematch and to make matters worse , Peters was shot to bits.
    One guy was holding Joe Frazier , the other was holding Sam Peter.. See the difference here?

    Finally , Wlad would never have fought a rematch with Povetkin if measures were in place to ensure he wasn't allowed use a single back hump or octopus grab. Ali fought 3 Frazier fights. Wlad took his cheat win over Povetkin and ran.