fact! to all naz lovers...pls. fell free to watch naz fight before making him as your 1 ass punch king...:hat
true again....barrera managed to fight naz head to head and KD naz, but agains pac, he always move backward and trying to protect any angle of his body!:good
He wouldn't know. He completely outboxed Hamed and didn't get hit too flush. Pacquiao had far more speed than Naz, and his style was entirely different. So he caught MAB and dropped him. MAB also said Valero hit harder than Pacquiao, which I firmly disbelieve. Besides, that's not really a good argument, since we aren't really going to ask him.
in other words, pac is the most powerfull puncher barrera have ever met in his boxing life...or even the worst opponent in his flawless carrer..
My impression was when Barrera said Valero hits harder than Pacquiao, therefore he's saying Pacquiao hits harder than anyone except Valero.
Jump in logic. He was sparring with Valero to ready for a fight with Pacquiao. It was most likely in reference to the fact that he was facing a power puncher to prepare for Pacquiao, and he simply said Valero hit harder when talking about his preperation. And as I said, he was not hit flush much by Hamed. This is like asking Lennox Lewis who hit harder between Rahman and Tua. Tua never caught Lennox but Rahman did.
Lennox Lewis is 6'6" and David Tua only 5'9". C'mon, a soccer player going against an NBA player. David Tua had a hard time reaching the very tall Lewis and Lewis fought backward throughout the fight. No knockdowns, very little action. A mismatch in size and arm-length reach advantage. Barrera, Pacquiao and the rest are well within the size and arm-length reach advantage.