Of course it does! It means Bradley has been able to have 3 years worth of fights more than Khan has. It's like taking Pacquiao and Mayweather's last 3 years worth of opponents away and then comparing their P4P status. Would they be on the P4P list if you took their last 3 years worth of opponents away? Mayweather probably would, but would Manny?
Its a stupid argument because Khan had all the Olympic hype and Bradley had to work much harder (figuratively speaking, they both work very hard) to get to where he is at. Eg Khan got a shot to pieces Barrera in Manchester and Bradley had to travel to the UK to fight Witter in a backgarden. Everyone knows hype accelerates careers
Tim Bradley has a win over the P4P King. That beats anything on Khan's resume. However, I think Khan has got a very good resume considering his age. And if his performances remain at a high level, by the time he's finished, it will much more impressive.
Khan does. Considering the Pacquiao fight was a robbery and Lamont Peterson has admitted to being on steroids in the Khan fight Khan 140 - Kotelnik (beat Alexander), Maidana, Malignaggi (Now WBA 147 champ), Judah (Former IBF champ and WW champ) Bradley - Witter, Alexander and Peterson. the rest of his wins are coming from shot lightweights I pick Khan to win if they were to fight