Who has a better Resume Froch or Calzaghe???

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by hammers571, Nov 17, 2011.


  1. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Calzaghe has the better record. People go on about who Froch has faced since he turned 31, but seriously would Joe lose to any of them?
     
  2. The_Daddy

    The_Daddy Member Full Member

    430
    0
    Aug 7, 2010
    I think if you look at their records on Boxrec Froch has the better resume, but I think without a doubt if any version of Calzaghe from the Eubank victory until retirement wins a very wide UD against Froch

    For all those saying Calzaghe should have done this and done that after beating Jones Jr, you have to look at it in perspective - he was mid-late 30's with very bad hands - he had made himself undisputed at Super Middle and Light Heavy, and had 2 enormous pay days at the end of his career - he had nothing left to fight for....My only regret is that he had left ****** 10 years earlier and fought the biggest names, rather than plodding around defending his title against mandatorys
     
  3. ontheup

    ontheup Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,849
    0
    Mar 9, 2010
    Froch has fought the best one after the other, did calzaghe? i no who i will miss more, when its over...
     
  4. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrauy1uQYQY&feature=related[/ame]
     
  5. Nipple

    Nipple I hate my username banned

    5,332
    5
    Sep 6, 2010
    So many no-marks on this record...

    [url]http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=5364&cat=boxer[/url]
     
  6. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Joe for now, Carl can better his resume starting with Ward. He's not to far away but whether he can beat Ward,Bute and Kessler remains to be seen. It'll be amazing if he added them 3 names to his resume as wins.
     
  7. fortysixando

    fortysixando Active Member Full Member

    1,039
    0
    Sep 20, 2011
    carl the ****** froch is massively overrated and massively big mouthed
     
  8. Audley Fan

    Audley Fan Member Full Member

    164
    0
    May 22, 2011




    "win"
     
  9. SuspiciousChees

    SuspiciousChees Active Member Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Aug 7, 2010
    Calzaghe won his title in 1997 against Eubank, and fought Kessler in 2007. For 10 years he never faced an elite fighter.
     
  10. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    froch hasnt beaten the best, unless you think johnson, taylor, pascal, abraham and dirrell are the best super middleweights.

    Eubank, hopkins, kessler, mitchell, reid, and woodhall are clearly better, yes they are more spread out than froch's top wins. but calzaghe has the better wins.

    Who has froch beaten that you would rate higher than kessler, eubank and hopkins?
     
  11. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    8
    Dec 5, 2006
  12. Kid Lucky

    Kid Lucky Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,805
    1
    Sep 25, 2008
    Froch has had a better run than Calzaghe ever had, but over a career Joe's resume is better.

    If Carl goes and beats Ward then that might change things significantly.
     
  13. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  14. Zavi

    Zavi Guest

    Back to back defences against Ward & Kessler might not be different to what he’s got now.
     
  15. Zavi

    Zavi Guest

    Busted Kessler worse.