Who has a better resume? Povetkin or Wilder?

no thats a lie, charr was nothing. stiverne was at least a weak titlist.

 

Aaaaaand here we boil down to the issue. Forgive me for misinterpreting your answer, but I feel I'm not really to blame for that, you're the one that answered the wrong question .

Check the title of the thread again, buddy. It doesn't ask who's resume do you like, it asks who has the better resume, which as I said isn't nearly as subjective as you were making it out to be. Asking whose resume you like on the other hand is entirely subjective. Glad we could clear this up though.

 

We agree on Povetkin having the better resume. We agree that Wilders opponents aren't as good. I just like Wilders for those things mentioned earlier to add to that - who doesnt want to be the WBC Heavyweight champion of the world with an undefeated record. I hope you see what Im saying.

Wrong person to ask, I'm a big fan of Floyd not outside the ring but in it. Anyway, were talking Wilder/Povetkin here and I've answered your last question and I think Ive been pretty fair throughout. Thats all I want to say on this matter my friend

 

This is the most honest answer. Povetkins resume is far superior to Wilders however i think its a 50/50 when they go head to head in the ring.

 

Ahh we correct each other. You're absolutely forgiven for re-writing/misinterpreting my quote and I did get it wrong in regards to the title of the thread. I did say though who I thought had the better resume but I picked the one I like, so my bad. All good

Not everyone will agree with me and I seek to understand why but I do accept that.

 

You're nothing.

 

So you basically put more value on Wilder stopping almost everybody he faced than the quality of who he faced, if I have it right. I can see that but then I guess my view is that Wilder looked like garbage for a good deal of his fights against weak opposition - Szpilka and Washington to name a few - whereas the only guy to really dominate Povetkin was Wlad, who is the king of the last decade.

 

so you arent going to bother replying, ok. poor duck

 

Wilder better resume hes the Wbc champion
Sahsa a parriah.

 

Reply to what? That Stiverne's best win was the blubber version of Arreola that Vitali beat the prime out of, 5 years earlier? Or that 15-20 Demetrice King stopped Stiverne?

What sort of dense argument are you trying to make THIS time?

 

dunno, which one are you contriving this time by claiming Charr was a better win than winning a world title?

Povs best win is huck. I would concede thats better than stiverne, and like I said you need to compare same stage careers so its probably not even valid. Chaggy? maybe. but thats it.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts

^ Herol's opinion. We all know what that's worth.

 

you introduced charr!

I've done nothing other than point out its wrong.

lame comeback, you simply gave up on replying. AGAIN.

(and gave up on replying to a reply that supports your argument - i gave you EVERY CHANCE, a free leg up and you still didnt muster a reply.)

 

Povetkin, but then again, with his use of steroids, was really a tougher resume?

 

Povetkin never used steroids. Try again.