Who has a better shot at winning by KO Pac or Mayweather?

Pacman

 

Pac. Mayweather is ****.

 

Pac. Check their KO ratios. Not remotely close.

 

pacman

 

mp...

 

Mayweather has a 65% KO percentage, Manny has a 68 you ****ing gimp.

 

Good one.


Anyway, definitely Pacquiao. Pacquiao has a more offensive style. Its the logical choice.

 

It's a more complex equation than it may first seem.

However, I still back Manny.

 

delete

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floyd_Mayweather,_Jr.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manny_Pacquiao

Manny Pacquiao

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

Floyd Mayweather, Jr.

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

pac

 

Both. Mayweather with that extra bit of poundage Pacquiao will once again attempt to refute by non-existence against Cotto, and Pacquiao from the southpaw puzzle, which has facilitated Mayweather seen hurt on more than one occasion in his career.

 

Why are you not counting his losses ****stick? Why are you only counting the fights he won? Of course he didnt KO anybody when he got KTFO himself jackass.

His real KO% douchebag.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=boxer&human_id=6129

 

That's why it's called wins by KO atsch. How the **** do you score a KO when you lose???

Anyway, however you want to look at it, Pac is ahead of Mayweather, so your arguement means absolutely

This content is protected

.

Even when you count Pac's 3 losses and 2 draws, he still beats Mayweather's KO ratio.