Who has accomplished more in their career? Deontay Wilder or Michael Grant?

has he got some math text book and a calculator to work all this out? I think Wilder punches 3.654111% times harder than Fury

 

He rocked Wilder to his boots in sparring. Now, I wouldn't normally draw attention to sparring footage apart from the fact you stated Haye did 'absolutely nothing' to suggest he would have beaten Wilder, and that's not true. Hyperbole is not your friend...

 

Wilder has accomplished more than Grant....

 

Again for you.

 

Wilder, and it's not even close, just due to the fact that he won a world title and has defended it 7 times.

I really don't know why this is even a question.

 

You have used the term incorrectly and do not even know what it means.

I have no cognitive dissonance, and obviously not. Look it up and get back to me on what it actually means.

 

So you choose to believe what someone who apparently witnessed the spar said rather than what you can see with your eyes. You also mention Haye admited he was at 100% but offer no evidence to tell us how hard Wilder was trying. I'm not saying Haye would have won, I'm saying to suggest there was 'absolutely nothing' to support he could or would win is hyperbole. Haye at his peak could have beaten Wilder; he could also have lost. 'Very little evidence' supporting a case for him winning would have been more persuasive. Overstating an argument only weakens it...

 

Look at the ****in' state of you bud. Using semantics to redefine the state of the HW division to suit yourself. Yeah bubba, you got the cognitive dissonance and the megalomania to boot.

It's cute that you looked it up.

 

Listen, i already discussed this fight and made my points as to why i think Wilder would win in this thread. And if you think a snippet of a sparring session is "something" to suggest Haye would beat him then we disagree, i stand by my point that Haye hasn't shown anything at heavyweight and this is not hyperbole at all, i followed Hayes whole career.

 

So you can see there was a snippet from a spar which could support that Haye and Wilder were competitive. I'll accept your shift in stance...

 

Honestly i don't know what you want from me LMAO, are you on drugs ? I said it was a snippet of a sparring session to make Haye look good, it wouldn't make sense if he wouldn't be competitive in that video.

But that video is not a proof that Haye would beat Wilder in an actual fight because Richard Tower and Haye
himself said that Wilder looked great against him.

The original poster i was responding to used that video to support his claim that Haye would beat Wilder or at
least he insinuated it which i don't agree with, that was all.

 

Guy, now you have used two big words incorrectly.

Really, stop. You are making an ass out of yourself.

 

Well obviously Wilder. Grant never won any piece of the championship. Sure Grant fought Lewis but got knocked out and other than than Golota probably his best win. That's not any better than Ortiz really. Wilder doesn't have a strong resume but he's a defending world champion

 

Two? You can't count?

Yep, semantics to support your cognitive dissonance caused by the halo effect. .....hoe

 

Damon Wayans used to have a routine on IN LIVING COLOR about a pseudo-intellectual who just throws out words randomly. Reminds me a bit of you.

Or, to say it more simply, you are a bit of an idiot.

But good luck to you. I think it is great that we have a society where even a simpleton like yourself can live and be happy.