Who has better chance of beating Floyd? Pac or Marquez?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Soriano, May 9, 2009.


Page 2 of 4
  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    22-2 in the poll in favor of Pacquiao as of this post, yet beside Soriano who has'nt said much but that he does'nt believe JMM can handle the weight and he believes Pac can.......

    ......22 *******s vote for Pac and yet cant come up with reasons why!:lol:

    Goes to show you how *******ed this forum has become!:yep

    :DI love Manny, he's great and a great fighter, but you *******s are something else!:lol::nut
     
    divac, May 9, 2009
    divac, May 9, 2009
    #16
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    27-2

    This board is hoarded with *******s!:lol:
     
    divac, May 9, 2009
    divac, May 9, 2009
    #17
  3. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    28-2 and not one solid post on the reasoning on why Pac has a better chance at beating Mayweather than JMM!:nut
     
    divac, May 9, 2009
    divac, May 9, 2009
    #18
  4. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    divac:

    So your man is behind in the polls. Why resort to name calling?

    I didnt vote, btw. This hypothetical **** usually doesnt follow the script in real life, anyway.
     
    bulakenyo, May 9, 2009
    bulakenyo, May 9, 2009
    #19
  5. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Quit whining like your idol, Divac. How can you be sure that all those who voted for Pac are *******s? They probably agree to my opinion that Marquez is not yet tested in the 143-145 weight division and he is fighting a former #1 P4P fighter Floyd. Pac, btw, has better showing against common opponents than Floyd. :deal
     
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    #20
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    Bula, let me have my fun with Soriano, I know you dont like me using the name "*******".....but I dont believe I've ever referenced you with that name.

    There are reasonable Pac fans on this board I dont reference to by the name *******.......

    .....but C'mon now......Soriano calling on solid reasons of peoples opinions, and not one of the people voting on the poll so far has yet even posted anything......
    .....those I call *******s, that could'nt form an opinion if they tried.

    Debate with me reasonably as you have done many of times, the "*******" name never makes it out of the holster!;)

    My intention is not to offend the educated Pac fan like yourself Bula!:thumbsup
     
    divac, May 9, 2009
    divac, May 9, 2009
    #21
  7. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    There ******* because not a one has even posted in the thread!:lol:
     
    divac, May 9, 2009
    divac, May 9, 2009
    #22
  8. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Divac, I don't really mind if you call me ******* or any name you can think of to anyone who disagrees w/ you. But calling all who voted for Pac *******s in this poll is too sweeping and and irresponsible. IMO, ******* is now a badge of honor in ESB. I'm proud to be one, actually, as we believe Pac as the best fighter pound for pound in the world today.
     
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    #23
  9. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    You make me laugh, Divac w/ this post. :rofl:rofl:rofl Just because they did not post here makes them all *******s? :patsch You're running out of arguments, Divac, and you resort to name-calling. :yep
     
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    #24
  10. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I voted Many Pacquiao - tho we will never know because yet again the poll wasnt made public viewing ;) - because he looks not only more comfortable at higher weights but better too + the speed, power & his attacking style compared to Marquez boxing style which Floyd would prefer being a boxer himself.
     
    Bill Butcher, May 9, 2009
    Bill Butcher, May 9, 2009
    #25
  11. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    By Divac's standards, by posting in this thread, you're no longer a *******.:lol:
     
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    #26
  12. Pound4poundx

    Pound4poundx Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    0
    Mar 25, 2008
    I want to see Pacquiao test his new boxing accumen against an opponent that doesn't plod forward ie:Diaz and Hatton). Let's see if his new style works against a guy with boxing prowess.
     
    Pound4poundx, May 9, 2009
    Pound4poundx, May 9, 2009
    #27
  13. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    If Floyd fights Pac today, he will surely lose because of ring rust. Marquez is just too lucky, Floyd accepted his challenge like picking cherries. Had he waited one day more, he would have fought Pac, as Roach said. He added, Floyd is scared of Pac.
     
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    Soriano, May 9, 2009
    #28
  14. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    Pac. Speed & power.
     
    Gneus7, May 9, 2009
    Gneus7, May 9, 2009
    #29
  15. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    In the great words of Pacdbest.. Pak-E-Ow!!
     
    Sandmanl337, May 9, 2009
    Sandmanl337, May 9, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 4