Who has better footwork? Pac or Floyd

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mancat, Jan 26, 2012.


  1. Matty lll

    Matty lll Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    21
    Jan 21, 2011
    Because Gander is refusing to admit he is wrong
     
  2. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    Right so you can't explain it then can you? Bc you dont know what the **** your talking about.

    I never said Pac has better footwork then Floyd's. I made that pretty clear. You ******s just wanna make a debate out of everything.

    To say everything Pac dose is speed and not footwork is flat out stupid, and no body with actual boxing knowledge would agree with you.
     
  3. mrjotatp4p

    mrjotatp4p THE ONE Full Member

    15,571
    8
    Feb 5, 2010
    Freddie Roach agrees with us. Nnobody said Manny didn't have footwork. We said he doesn't have great footwork and that it doesn't come close to Floyd's. You even mentioned his speed. :rofl:rofl
     
  4. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Here Karceno makes a good video once in a while

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0aHy7lRWrQ[/ame]
     
  5. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    At times, Pac does waste unwarranted enegy by bouncing around...If he footwork was so good as you're making it out to be, why did he have problems closing the distance on Mosley and JMM. ( just to name a few)If Pac's footwork is so good as you're claiming, why is it that he has such a hard time cutting down the ring...I've asked you this several times and you keep on rehashing the same ole arguement...After my years of watching boxing, a person that has good footwork can cut down the ring and pin his opponent down..I cant say the same for Pac.

    You're telling me to watch more boxing is quite ironic coming from you...You cant even tell the differnce between actual footwork and footspeed, yet I'm the one that needs to watch more boxing?:lol:

    If you gonna call me a ******...you better cross all of your T and dot your i! You better be on your **** because I'm gonna flip it back on you...You call me a ****** but your simple minded ass cant even string together a coherent sentece. By the way its You're all on ignore not your!:rofl
     
  6. REEVO

    REEVO Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,142
    2
    Mar 16, 2009
    Mayweather... No question..
     
  7. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Just to clarify, footspeed is separate from footwork, and it is not as closely related to footwork as is being made out in this thread.

    It's ok having great footspeed, but if your FEET do not land in the correct position, the correct position to get your shots off whilst balanced...it is almost pointless. Khan can be argued as having great footspeed, but he is continually off balance, his feet are never in the correct position. Does his footspeed make up for his positioning and balance so that he has good footwork? No.

    Also, Pacquiao is not off balance as much as people make out, nor is his footwork as bad as people are saying.
     
  8. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    Mayweather - much smoother
     
  9. mancat

    mancat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,511
    1
    Jun 20, 2007
    This is what one pro says:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPY1cJ1dcxE&feature=g-all-u&context=G2edf9efFAAAAAAAAEAA[/ame]
     
  10. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    ................................ru serious?.................................
     
  11. Matty lll

    Matty lll Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    21
    Jan 21, 2011
    Plenty of guys in this thread are knowledgabe and they agree wtith me. In fact so does almost everyone else in this thread and so would anyone who isn't nut hugging Pacquaio.

    Its already been explained many times and I have already given my opinion. Do you want me to explain it again? :lol:

    Pacquaio creates some awkward angles against guys who are right there in front of him by bouncing about. He gets away with this because he is fast, this is what people are saying.

    When he faces someone who doesn't just stand there in front of him such as in the Marquez fight, he is made to look foolish because he can barely hit him. He is poor at cutting off the ring and he also takes himself out of range due to his excessive bouncing. Also, He is constantly off balance when he trows punches as shown in all the Marquez fights.

    Also in the Marquez fight he does a horrible job of maintaining his distance and staying within punching range. Marquez was able to dictate the fight with clever feints and superior footwork. Manny showed no improvment at all between the second and third fight which shows whis footwork hadnt improved at all no mater how it looked against guys like Margarito and Cotto who are there to be hit.

    I cam in here thinking you were a decent enough poster but that I disagreed with you. Now I see you are just a blind, petty fanboy who is tossing insults about because he has been proven wrong on many occassions. Watch that video and honsetly explain to me how we are wrong.

    Also a forum is were you are meant to debate and discuss things not just slabber to people instead of admitting they are wrong
     
  12. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :rofl:rofl:rofl you seem mad!
     
  13. mancat

    mancat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,511
    1
    Jun 20, 2007