Who has Judah beat to deserve a fight with Khan??

Coldhearted, you picked the wrong forum to act like a mong on :deal

Lets' roll ya' thick **** :thumbsup

First and foremost, RE: Mabuza; 'his best win was Kendall Holt'. Well, he managed something Khan probably wouldn't then, as Holt would send his head into the audience and into his poor old Mums lap. Do one.

Judah has 'no good wins'. Well, Judah is no 'great', but he's been a useful fighter for years, showing some good attributes and some bad traits, but he's mixed it up with all the top fighters of the past ten or so years over a few weights, and has had sporadic success. Based on wins over Matthyse and Mabuza he's just inside/just outside the top 5@140, so he's certainly a decent enough challenger for a paper titlist like Khan (his belt means zilch, nada, zero, and every other way of measuring nothingness) and his win over Spinks was a surprise I felt at the time. Okay, he has shown some bad character traits, but it's unlike Khan, a sloppy feather fist, will be able to exploit these aspects of Zabs mental game. Judah is like a far better McCloskey with much more pop, how ragged is Khan going to look against him before he gets splattered across the canvas?

If Khan had fought Tszyu at 140 and Floyd at 147, he'd do considerably worse (and yes, Khan is one of the few fighters who could look worse against Tszyu than Zab did :deal)

I've lowered myself to your level, but if you'd like for me to make you look even more a **** I'm happy to oblige :good

In short: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=6

 

I admit there are some hypothetical points in there, but that's not the crux of my argument.

Which is: Judah is a good fighter. So is Khan. That is why Zab 'deserves' a shot at a man who holds a belt which means **** ALL. It is a fight between two top ten fighters, nothing more, nothing less. Also, that beating Holt is a good thing, and Mabuza deserved credit as a viable opponent for Zab going into it. THE IBF STRAP MEANS NOTHING WHEN EVALUATING JUDAH AS A FIGHTER EXCEPT THAT YOUR SAVIOUR FEELS BELTS ARE IMPORTANT, HE'S GIVING MORE MONEY AWAY THE SOFT LAD.

If you think the 'WBA Full Super Interim Trinket' means anything more than being a nice accessory to a robe/Reebok garb, than that's your fault for being a spastic.

So why don't you tell me why one top ten fighter has to 'deserve' a shot against another top ten fighter? Even if you take the belt into effect, how often are the stringent rules of these upstanding governing bodies really really enforced? Who did Salita beat to earn a shot at that holy WBA 'Championship'?

 

No, this one has opinions. I've some fun to be had yet.

 

Not with the Flea Man in full flow!

 

http://europeansportsnews.paddypower.com/index.php?fn=Magic&ln=Man91&nc=Stringfellows

Right there funnily enough. Gotta love Paddy Power

 

Lineal Welterweight champion>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>WBA Trinket

 

**** all?

He was the undisputed welterweight champion

 

Cool. So why don't you name some of the great champions from our past then? The ones that actually won a REAL World title.

I want 75, without using google, wikipedia, boxrec, or anything else that isn't in your memory. Four minutes should be enough. If you don't post back by then I assume you don't know what you're talking about and your opinion has as much use as elderly woman to Gary Glitter.

 

This is the obvious point I was holding back. I wanted to see if he was going to put him in his list of champions....that really would've been an epic fail :deal

 

There's a thread on Poonsawat that's much better.

No? Ok.

:sad2

 

Not only has Judah already achieved something Khan might never achieve (linear championship status) he will always go down as a man that hasn't been chinned by Breidis Prescott.

Double score :good

 

Lucky that, because as every other poster around you is demonstrating, you have already lost for knowing **** ALL about the sport this forum concerns:hi: