:-( You better call me sir................:smoke Regardless, Like I said Wlad has KO'd 6 of his last 8 oppoents all of which were REAL Heavyweights. What's not to like?
So was Tye Fields before getting KTFO....So by your logic Tye Fields wouldve been a decent and dangerous fight because he was undefeated? You along with your logic FAILS
Put it this way, IF (and I know it's a big if) Haye catches Wlad clean, Wlad WILL go down. Whether Haye can avoid Wlad's punches for long enough to hit him back is another matter though. Haye will have enormous trouble with someone Wlad's size.
I do realise that, but even going safety first you are going to get hit, especially if you carry an opponent for 12 rounds. The limited Sam Peter managed to clip him 3 times and put him on the deck. If he fights negatively against someone with the speed and power of Haye he will get hit and he will go down. To beat Haye he needs to fight more aggressively than he has done of late.
If you care to take a gander at the poll results you'll see the better posters, some who clearly aren't fans of either Klitschko, voted that Wlad has more power. I believe this is because it's a undisputable fact. :deal
I believe Wlad fights according to the style & aggression his opponents present. Haye is tailor made for Wlad, just as Peter was tailor made for Vitali. Haye's jab is nothing compared to Wladimir's & Wlad has consistent power in both hands and the command of the ring necessary to keep Haye outside looking in. If Haye goes all out early he'll be knocked out early.
To answer the question... Wlad. Bigger man, bigger hands and the technique to use them. I just want to make one point, and a simple one. If these two fight I will stump up the PPV price without a second thought. And I won't be alone.