Who Has More Punch Power, Wlad or Haye?

If you look on the Brit forum you will see that most Brits do not give Haye much chance against Vitali and probably two thirds think Wlad KOs him too.

The difference is that whilst Wlad is the better boxer than Vitali, we know that Wlad can and has been beaten by lesser boxers than himself. Vitali has that ****ing titanium chin, so even if someone like Haye lands...so what?

I remember when Lewis landed the uppercut in the 6th and I was half way out of my chair to celebrate, and then saw he was still on his feet, and I was like "What the **** is going on? He's supposed to be on the floor".

The only thing that annoys me is people saying Haye has done nothing, is a bum and so on. People saying he would lose to ****ing Cunnigham etc.:roll:

And guys like Zakman just repeating "He will be KOd by the first decent puncher" after his initial thing of "He will be KOd by the first genuine heavy" failed to prove right.

They act as if they have seen some secret flaw when they talk about his chin, when everyone knows his chin is dodgy. But no matter who he beats next that will simply delay the "I told you so, look at my amazing knowledge" crap that will come out when he gets stopped.

If he beat Peter and Valuev and then lost to Wlad, he would be called a bum and said to have achieved nothing and it is pretty lame.

 

To me this fight, Wlad vs Haye, is a bit like Kessler vs Dawson. I cannot disagree with anything anybody would say about kessler getting outboxed by Dawson, nor can I really mount an argument as to why Wladimir would not beat up Haye from the outside. As these are the most likley outcomes.

I just feel that for both of these fights, and particularly Wlad vs Haye, that Wladimir will get caught by something at some point due to Haye's speed and would be hurt enough to get finished.

I don't think its the most likley outcome, just more of a gut feeling if you get what I mean...:think

 

Think about it though, he done that with Wlad to get himself noticed and hey guess what it worked like a treat. He's a clever man. Now after his first real fight at heavy he's being talked about as Wlads opponent next year.

You see him in other interviews like the one after the Barrett fight and he's very honest and respectful.

 

I voted wlad and also peters punches are alot heavier than hayes no doubt about it,, peter just lacks the techniqe to deliver it. If I had to stand still and let wlad,peter or haye take a free shot on me,, I'd pick haye everytime

 

Sam would demolish Haye.

 

VERY solid point. I couldn't agree more. WK's punches are so straight, which is where true power comes from. Haye hits hard, but its primarily hooks. When he gets wild, they get very wide too. That takes away a lot.

Peter is just like cave man. The guy is thick and hits accordingly.

 

wlad
hands down no question

 

OK, but who quite on his stool totally shot and decimated without controversy?
I'd like to see rematch.:deal
You OK with that?

 

me either just saying if one HAD to lol