Who has the best Resume in SMW history?

The Tarver and Johnson fights were at light heavy not super Middle.

Your knowledge of the sport or lack of it is embarrassing.:deal

 

He lover !! How are you doing....we are talking full body of work here....chump...and even if we limits to SWM, I still stay with Ward!


Kisses and hugs
!! :hi:

 

You're absolutely right. The edge to Hopkins among those "big 3 wins" by a minimal margin at most probably.

(my post came across rather odd... not exactly what I was trying to say)

 

You are one dumb MOFO.

The thread is about super MW and you bring Jones light heavyweight losses to the thread, your saggy old ass is so far out of it that you cant even understand a simple topic like this.

The maricon **** keep it to yourself and your life partner Kolya.

Does he still beat your ass silly when you dont behave?

I bet he he keeps your ***** ass in check :yep

 

Looking at SMW I still got Ward, can't you read...MOFO...

I wonder who are you, and why the anger....did you Mom didn't hug you enough, maybe to much....did you dad abused you, maybe the other way around....there's always sometime of issue when you got people like you....


Anyway back to boxing....yes WARD IMO has a better resume, and in a shorter career span than any of the others....:hi:

Have that anger issue checkout , ok!:good

 

Anger? Telling it like it is is anger?

Telling that you dont know **** about boxing which is true is anger?

Saying that you have homo tendencies which is true is anger?

Just telling it like it is demented old man if you cant take it call the nurse and dont forget to take the meds:hi:

 

How do you think Ward has a better SMW resume than Eubank, Calzaghe, Ottke etc. Steve Collins having 2 wins over Eubank and 2 wins over Benn has arguably a greater SMW resume, and his resume isnt close to the others. Resume wise Froch and Kessler although having lost to Ward, have arguably better SMW resumes. N Benn would have an arguement also

 

Let's look at Wards resume, Kessler very good win. Green a contender nothing more, Bika decent but was already beaten several times including Calzaghe easily, Abraham isn't a SMW Froch schooled him, Froch his best win a very impressive win. Dawson weight drained zombie, Rodriguez fringe contender. I really don't see how Ward has the best resume.

Froch has beaten Bute, Taylor, Abraham, Pascal, Groves.
Calzaghe has beaten Eubank, Woodhall, Bika, Lacey, prime Kessler.

Ward really doesn't have the best resume, He's a better fighter then Eubank, Benn, Froch, Collins. But resume wise his isn't the strongest ever.

 

This has gone way too many pages. The answer is Joe Calzaghe. We can now put this one to bed. :deal

 

its calzaghe or ward, depending on your preferences :good

 

You are telling yourself like it is....just like a computer data entry: garbage in...garbage out....

When you are ready to talk boxing, and not BS, let me know...till then, as they say....scram!!:hi:

 

dont be a muppet. Wards resume is a long way off Calzaghes at the moment. Only someone who doesnt know the division would think otherwise. I guess maybe you dont know

 

That seems reasonable for head to head. Froch can be a little inconsistent though. Joe Calzaghe might actually have won the head to head, but without a time machine, we'll never know.

Of course in reality Ezzard Charles would beat any of them at that weight.

 

you are quite right, though I'd add eubank and froch into the mix. only someone who doesn't know anytinhg about boxing would disagree hoho or add any such utterly defensive statement.
see below VVVV

 

To be honest I wouldn't even rank Ward 2nd.

I'd probably go:

1. Joe
2. Nigel Been
3. Chris Eubank
4. Andre Ward
5. Roy Jones
6. Carl Froch
7. James Toney
8. Steve Collins
9. Mikkel Kessler
10. Ottke?

:huh Something like that.