Who has the best victory of all time? Poll Added

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 8, 2011.


  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    The man you are thinking of is Charley Burley. Great fighter, p4p atg but people who say SRR avoided him have to stretch it a bit. When Robinson won his ww title, Burley fought already at mw and when Robinson fought at mw Burley was pretty much done or past it. Yes, they could have fought but it wasn´t a must fight. Burley wasn´t the most exciting fighter, which didn´t help in making this fight either. Aside of that, you can´t fight everyone - and Robinson did with one exception.


    Well, if Robinson was still in his prime it was very much at the end. Robinson was at his best at ww anyway.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    It was towards the end, but I think ray was prime enough.

    Yeah that's the one, shame they never got it on. Also shame ray didn't retire earlier.
     
  3. Diego Corrales (vs. Castillo in the first fight)
    or
    James "Buster" Douglas
     
  4. Log off immediately. :barf
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,797
    51,829
    Mar 21, 2007
    Sam Langford outboxing Joe Gans as a teenager, or Sam Langford knocking out Harry Wills with one punch as an adult.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,797
    51,829
    Mar 21, 2007

    wot?

    Robinson turned down a vast, career's best payday to take on Burley...it's a clean duck, why would you think otherwise?
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    Its too hard to say there is a clear no1 victory in history, my favourites are Ali-Foreman, Morales-Pacquiao & Leonard-Hagler.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,236
    Sep 15, 2009
    I am surprised many see morales outboxing pacman as up there at all.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,075
    3,664
    Jun 30, 2005
    Duran-Leonard 1 is definitely up there, but Duran was no longer a lightweight at that point. His last bout at 135 had been over two years before the fight with Ray.

    Duran fought a terrific fight. Very fast hands and feet, good upper body movement, well-placed combos from body to head. He managed to be ferocious yet methodical at the same time.

    Leonard was normally more of a flat-footed boxer anyway, not the fleet-footed dancer we saw in the rematch and against Hagler, so I don't really think he was that much out of his gameplan (or normal fighting style).
     
  10. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,075
    3,664
    Jun 30, 2005
    When they were supposed to fight, it was when Robinson was just a contender at WW. They fought on the same card in the Midwest and it was supposed to build-up to a bout between the two. Afterwards, Ray doubled his demand price from $25k to $50k.

    Burley himself never blamed Ray and said it was just the nature of the business, not enough money for them to just knock each other off. He had a ton of respect for Ray as a fighter and said he would've avoided Ray if the positions of the two were switched.
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    especially when you consider that Pac was moving up in weight and got cut by a headbutt.


    I'd say that Duran over Leonard is the best victory that I've ever seen.

    or maybe Frazier beating Ali
     
  12. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    What about Lamotta giving SRR his first lose
     
  13. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,075
    3,664
    Jun 30, 2005
    The 15 pound weight advantage hurts Lamotta's case.
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    When he himself was a young, inexperienced, moving up contender and Burley already a top guy for quite a while. (I´m exaggerating a bit) Would you risk your career, or at least put a halt on it for a while, against a high-risk low reward fight like Burley? Someone who was seen as a good but boring fighter, who couldn´t attract big crowds. If this would have happened prime for prime I´d agree it would have been a duck but it happened in 1942, before Robinson was quite there. And when he was, Burley fought at mw. That´s why I think you´ve got to stretch a bit to call it a duck.
    Gutted that ti didn´t happen so, even that early. Burley would get more credit and would be more known and Robinson would have turned out great anyway, even if he would have lost.



    See above.
     
  15. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Has anyone mentioned Spinks-Holmes I? I know its not number 1 but in my eyes thats one of the best ive seen, no one gave SPinks a chance and he was the first and last LH to beat a LINEAR heavyweight champion... and the first time he confused HOlmes with his awkwardness and lightning quick herky jerky moves. Spinks won this one pretty convincingly.