Who has the best victory of all time? Poll Added

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 8, 2011.


  1. Duck Dodgers

    Duck Dodgers Kimbo #1 P4P Full Member

    7,057
    5
    Sep 16, 2010
    This content is protected






    Need I say more?
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Worthy to put his career to a halt for a while?
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,372
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ali-foreman taking an unlikely lead!
     
  4. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    33
    Jan 4, 2009
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,372
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's funny really because I put ali-foreman up as an afterthought since I regard it as ali's biggest victory but not one of the biggest victories.

    To be fair though he was an underdog and it probably is his defining moment.

    Definitely surprised by it being the leader.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Henry Armstrong over Barney Ross
     
  7. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    doesn't Hagler Hearns deserve to be in the mix at least?

    Personally though I'd go for Duran Leonard, though Ali Foreman is probably my favorite from the list
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006

    NO RADIO. NO HOME TV.

    They're bragging about it. What a bunch of dicks.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have no idea what that means. He's a boxer, he wouldn't be putting his career on hold by boxing another great fighter for a career's best purse.

    You've leapt from "low reward" to a career "on hold", neither makes any sense really.
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    At that stage the possibility of him losing is pretty high. Of course it wouldn´t have derailed but him getting a shot at the title would probably have needed a while longer.

    Actually, my "leap" is no leap at all. It would have been a high risk low reward fight for the reason that the possibility of a pre-prime Robinson losing to a prime Burley is pretty high. And the money, even so it was a career high payday, wouldn´t have been good enough for the possible consequences of that.
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :huh Please tell me this is some sick joke???:blood
     
  12. Finesse74

    Finesse74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,016
    1
    Jul 28, 2010
    I pick Ali/Frazier cuz everyone boxing fan or not has heard about that fight.
     
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Given the circumstances surrounding this fight....I would have to go with Tyson-Douglass...Douglass mother just died and he was the 42-1 ( if my memory serves me correct) IMO that is a major hurdle to jump.
     
  14. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    :patschYou've got to be ****ing kidding me for even mentioning this!:rofl:rofl
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    So?

    Bodhi, it can't be a "low reward" fight if it's a career high payday.

    And where are you getting your time line from? Why is Robinson "pre-prime" in 1946? This is the year he won the title, he'd had seventy-five fights.

    So the resason Robinson didn't duck Burley is that he chose not to fight him because he might have lost?



    :lol:

    Come on, ffs. That's an actual definition of a dive.