Who has the better 49-0, Rocky or Floyd?

I don't know where the other guy is but my fighter is here...

 

Ahhh ..Yea

 

I'm 68 actually and no ,I don't box haven't for well over 40 years and your muscle is mainly between your ears Gaviscon. I don't expect or require respect from you I only desire it from those I respect and you sure don't tick that box!
Don't worry about any backlash I can handle a twat like you without even trying .lol

 

Actually,Mayweather Has The Names,Not The Prime Fighters,He Fought Everybody Past They're Prime Or Shot,Maidana,Corrales,Castillo Shot,Judah,Baldomir Mosley After Wars All Shot,Mayweather Has A Good Win Over Canelo Mostly Because Canelo Had To Work With Weight,And PAC Who Was Shot And Old As ****Dela Hoya Shot And Old Omg GATTI SHOT AND OLD AS ****,Even Augustus Was Shot And Old,Berto Was Never A Real Contender And Was Shot And Old Lololol Rocky Had Fought Prime After Prime Before Walcott Who Was Never In The Wars Really And Joe Both Over 35 Years Old Rocky Already Had The Wins Before Joe Louis And joe Walcott He Was Bound To Be A Hall Of Famer Regardless

 

That was the slip of the tongue that landed Weill in the sh*t*.He put Rocky under his son Marty's name and eventually had to resign as the Garden matchmaker,as you already know!

 

Its quite simple really... Pac is p4p better than Walcott and any historian will agree with this.. And while Walcott was ranked at the top of his divison at the time of the marciano fight, so was Pac ranked at the top of HIS division. The other obvious difference is that pac continued to fight on and is STILL ranked at the top of his division. Walcott retired.. Ezzard Charles is a better fighter than Pac on an all time scale. But he wasn't a champion when Marciano fought him and unlike Pac went down hill after fighting Rocky... Canelo Alvarez was 43-0 and holding two belts with a fresh win over a hot young champion and was 12 years younger than Floyd who rose in weight to utterly school him.. I've already covered the exaggerated claims about Canelo being " weight drained. " Do you really think Marciano's win over two guys, one of whom started his career two divisions below and the other who was 37, BOTH of which were past prime are better than these feats? If you do then that's fine.. But I strongly disagree. Not enough? How about Floyd winning a title in his 18th pro fight over a champion who was 38-1 and now sits in the world boxing hall of fame? Is THAT win not better than Rocky's victory over a guy who was 58-16-2 and when Rocky was a fully matured 28 years of age at 42-0?

 

Maidana was number 4.
Corrales was number 1,and unbeaten at 33-0-0
Cotto was number 1.
Castillo was number 1.
Hatton was 43-0-0

All these guys were shot but Louis,and Walcott werent' yeah sure.lol

 

I Defiantly Said Lousi And Walcot Was Shot,Rick Was In Wars Since Then Also ,Cotto Came Out a of Margarito n Pacman A Different Man Castillo And Corrales Happened And After That May Was Ready To Take a on Ether **** Fighter,Also Castillo Wasn't Number One For Long,Kostatyzu Was

 

You believe Corrales and Castillo were shot when Mayweather faced them?

 

Canelo argument again? Come on man, Canelo even currently is simply a meh fighter. Prior to fighting Floyd he fought one DECENT foe, just one. Barely good, and certainly not great. Yet he was supposed to be ready to face an ATG fighter in Floyd? Please, he wasn't close to being ready for that type of challenge, and frankly, Canelo isn't even a great fighter currently, let alone years ago. The Canelo argument carries no weight with me considering when Floyd fought him and the circumstances around it. Charles and Walcott were seasoned professionals and great fighters. They had already faced the best of the best and could draw experiences from that. What was Canelo drawing experience from when fighting Floyd? The powder puff foes he fought prior to Floyd? Come on man. Again, you CONTINUALLY keep skirting around the issue of Pac being hurt for the Floyd fight. You can go on and on about what Pac has done since then, and it has absolutely zero bearing on the discussion at hand, because again, he was hurt for the fight we're giving Floyd credit for. So you're telling me a hurt Pac, who was already on the downside of his career, is a better win than Charles or Walcott? As you say that is fine, but I really dont' think you believe that, and I strongly disagree with such an assertion

 

Yes and I've given you valid tangible reasons for my position and yet you come back with paragraph after paragraph basically saying nothing more than " the other guys were better. " I guess that's as far as this thing is gonna go.

 

Christ you're an old pecker which explains why you're so cranky all the time. I'm only 66 and have a much
younger outlook on life. Especially when I pay my Medicare bill.

 

You have no idea what my outlook on life is. I'm in a mellow chilled mood most of the time but I dont suffer fools .
I have a great life and much to be thankful for.I came back from Prague Thursday evening and I'm away again on the 21st of this month for 2 weeks.I went to a great Jazz club in Prague called the Jazz Republic,went to my regular jazz gig Sunday lunchtime which is my usual habit unless I'm playing cards.I don't have a medicare bill my treatment is free. You should have my life! Maybe your posts would improve a bit in quality?

 

LOL I'm doing very well, amigo. I sleep in silk pajamas. Prague is a fun town, been there for business.
Tried getting a shale play going in eastern Czech Republic but the eco-terrorists got the locals knickers in a twist.
I'm a former musician myself, and I play poker often, so we have more in common than you may think.
I just don't take this stuff as serious as you do, and I don't get off flaming people. Live and let live is one of
my motto's.

 

I'm glad you are doing well, I'm doing well enough to afford 4 holidays a year.I don't get off flaming posters but I've never had a problem responding to insults. I'm polite until treated rudely then its every man for himself. Numpties like Mendoza and Galvatron are just muppets to me . On is a proven l**r and bet welcher the other is a wannabee who thinks we have to post clips of ourselves hitting bags to prove our validity ,there were no dvd's or video recorders when I was boxing and I've no interest in massaging my ego , if people talk to me civilly I will respond in kind ,if not then all bets are off .I don't wear PJ's ,silk or otherwise.