Who has the better career FMJ or Pac Man (objective)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by xviiixvi, Dec 28, 2009.


  1. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Actually some considered Pac lost to JMM and some considered him the winner. If you really take a broad survey, the results of the official score card would be pretty much in line with the survey.

    It is still an opinion by the way. No matter if you use "major boxing sites."
     
  2. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Gratz you are an expert emoticon user. Next for you is reading comprehension and logical arguments. Pretty sure that will take time for you.
     
  3. xviiixvi

    xviiixvi Active Member Full Member

    775
    0
    Jun 9, 2007
    I'd pick the arturo gatti box set, but does that mean he has a better resume than manny or pac? That was dumb. I am simply saying BOTH FIGHTERS HAVE SMOKE AND MIRRORS IN THEIR RESUME. Being that PAC has 85% of his fights against NO NAME Philippinos and Hispanics brawlers, is it possible that maybe both of them have something to prove. Let's be honest for real. Floyd pics' light fighters and Pac fights Brawlers. If Floyd didnt cherry pic the last half of his career and Pac didnt spend 40 of his fights in the philipines they both would have different records that's all I am saying.
     
  4. deeta

    deeta Member Full Member

    232
    0
    Dec 5, 2009
    yeah and some also think pac won. unless youre only checking the boxing sites where it says jmm shouldve won.
     
  5. pwright2k

    pwright2k Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 5, 2009
    u idiot.
     
  6. pwright2k

    pwright2k Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 5, 2009
    u make good points, but i would definately get the floyd box set. watching him systematically break his opponents down, is like watching an artist paint a portrait.
     
  7. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
    Marquez 3? just saying
     
  8. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
    :lol::lol::lol::lol: ****in ******
     
  9. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    That was everything but objective.
     
  10. steele311

    steele311 Wanna Dance? Full Member

    2,248
    0
    Jan 29, 2009
  11. gatorbama

    gatorbama Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,158
    0
    Dec 16, 2009
    How can you say that Floyd Pics light fighters when most of his fight he was smaller in size? The only person i can remember him being bigger than is JMM. (which would have made a difference)
     
  12. xviiixvi

    xviiixvi Active Member Full Member

    775
    0
    Jun 9, 2007
    Don't say that someone may bring up Hatton.
     
  13. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    so much for an objective thread....FMJ is a better boxer than pacman...the rest is subjective...people may like manny more but floyd is a better fighter....he has never lost and has fought the same guys as pac...he fought the LW champ and beat him twice, he beat corrales with ease, gatti with ease, he has beaten everyone he has fought with ease...he will beat pac with ease
     
  14. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    But .. but .. a roided Pacman is so daaaamn DANGEROUS! ..might kick his ass so easily so let's change the boxing rules and do drug test on him first... :nut
     
  15. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    he split two fights with morales in his prime then morales was done....he beat barrera at the end of his prime....hatton ODLH cotto far from prime and perfect opponents and jmm who was a dif style than a punching bag split with him....how has he never ducked anyone and floyd did? pac didn't fight Juan Diaz, campbell, JMM3, he fought david diaz....I am not saying he ducked but neither did floyd...he fought cotto at 145 WHY? ODLH was completely drained...he fought PBF at 165 and pac at 147...not pacs fault but not that impressive...all of pacs fights have been against slow fighters with limited defense....floyd has beat every type of fighter and dominated them...they are both great floyd would crush pac in th ring:deal