Who has the better career FMJ or Pac Man (objective)

what is wrong with a drug test....nothing to hide right? wow ur a real stickler to thoase boxing rules...like boxing has these great commissions that are so fair...he can take the test prove he is innocent and fight...not hard

 

but Pac is so EASY right?, why do so much work man? it's so easy Easy Easy EASY no need for training... but wait ... roided Pacman aint EASY, let's go beyond the boxing RULES and apply for more drug tests. :nut

oh yeah Boxing Commissions aren't fair.. I mean who knows Floyd's last 40 fights might have been all questionable as u can see no stringent drug tests were made .. :yep

 

pacquiao has by far the better resume,

but of coarse mayweather and pacman are on some ****in bull****

both can choke on a ****in dick

 

Pacquiao has fought better opposition , he has beaten better fighters and in more impressive ways.. it is as simple as that

 

Why didn't Shaefer allow for Mosley to be blood tested then?

 

Hard to read man, you should use more paragraphs !

It is a toss up, I think both have an argument but I am going with Floyd on this one.

 

the point of this is its pac who is saying he doesnt want the test and he has a list of reasons and stipulations to go along with it

 

pacquiao has made demands to floyd as well don't forget that...he damanded:

8oz gloves rather than 10oz...which floyd agreed to
10 million dollar weight penalty...

pacquiao doesn't want 'random' tests and doesn't wanna be tested within 30 days of the fight!!!!!!!!!

pacquiao does have the better resume though....but floyd would beat pac so it doesn't matter

 

And the real motive of the thread emerges

 

He beat Barrera at his peak. Barrera beat Morales before that fight and after that fight. He also wone 2 titles after that fight and defended the WBC twice successfully. His next defeat after Pac was not until against JMM.

 

Having been acused of writting this. I had to check it out for myself.
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=195661
It is hard to be completly objective but I think you do a very good job at it in this thread. I see no bias twards one boxer or the other.
As you have pointed out neither Pacquiao or Mayweather have been in the ring with anyone who can truly prepare them for each other.
You also point out the flaws in their resumes.
My honest opinion is that Mayweather has the better resume at 147 than Pacquiao dose.

 

mayweather's main body of work was done at the lower weights...hernandez, castillo, and corrales were all impressive wins...i don't agree with u that jmm is better than both MAB and EM...he barely beat MAB..and MAB and EM are not identical in style...

 

Pac but not by as much as people seem to think. If they fight and Floyd wins, then he easily tops Pac on any all time list. If Pac wins, then he cements his place well above Floyd.

I think the "Pac is top 15 ATG" people are exaggerating a bit but I'm not one to be petty over the numbers like that.

The people who act like Floyd has never been a legit P4P, or act as though he is not a great fighter, are a bit ridiculous though.

 

Hmmm, I thought the guys Pacquaio was fighting early in his career were better than most of the garbage Mayweather was fighting... Mayweather also always had the better training, money, management and promoting early on..

and the Girl in the Avy is Agustina Schilardi Google search her for a good time :good