Who has the better middelweight resume, Hopkins or Hagler?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Canibus81, Jun 21, 2011.


  1. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Hagler's win over Hearns or Leonard (he did win dis one in my book) are a far better achievement than Hopkins's entire career. And I am a Bernard's fan.
     
  2. RickyRicardo

    RickyRicardo Member Full Member

    328
    0
    Feb 11, 2010
    Money Mayweather is better than both. Both guys have loses and mayweather has how many losses?????
     
  3. Ncc84

    Ncc84 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,709
    2
    Oct 14, 2009
    Why does the fact that Hearns and Leonard fought at welter and moved up mean that those wins dont count? They were both world champions at middleweight, they were even world champions at higher weights than middle. You've added some arbitary condition to suit Hopkins.
     
  4. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    This thread was about who beat the better TRUE Middleweights. SRL, duran, Hearns, Trinidad, Mugabi and DeLa Hoya were fighters coming up in weight.
     
  5. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    2
    Mar 10, 2011
    With the criteria you laid out it's about even. If you were to factor in everyone they faced at MW including people moving up etc... Then Hagler gets it easy, not even a comparison. But again I based this answer on the criteria you laid out. Everybody with a huge argument that it wouldn't be at least close one way or the other is not reading the actual first post, just reading the subject.
     
  6. Canibus81

    Canibus81 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,698
    26
    Sep 16, 2008

    Exactly.
     
  7. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,705
    292
    Jun 15, 2011
    Two great fighters, but Hagler is one of my all-time favs, so I'm a bit biased.

    IMO, Hagler was more aggressive, & had better accuracy (maybe the best ever?)

    He was also simply more fun to watch. That has to count for something, yes?
     
  8. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
     
  9. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    Hagler, is the greatest middleweight ever. Hopkins resume is not even close.
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,687
    13,499
    Jan 6, 2007

    Using your own post, it's not close.

    And those aren't Hagler's best wins.


    Where's Mugabi ?

    Hamsho ?

    Hearns ?

    Any one of Hagler's top four wins is superior to ANY of Bernard's MW wins.
     
  11. PopeJackson

    PopeJackson Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,615
    3
    Dec 8, 2007
    Hagler most definitely has the better resume. His win against Hearns is better than anything Hopkins has.
     
  12. FAT_TONEY

    FAT_TONEY Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    12
    Feb 28, 2011
    Talking MW resume, Haglers is definitely A LOT better.
    However, this is a bit unfair to Hopkins since many of Hopkins best wins and achievements have come since he moved up in weight when he was a relatively old man already.
     
  13. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,247
    4
    Dec 7, 2008
    Talking of resume, Hagler has one of the best of all-time. To have 3 all-time greats on your resume is something of an amazing achievement. Hopkins unfortunately does not have any while fighting in the middleweight division and the only one he did fight (RJJ), he lost to....