Who has the better resume: David Haye or Tomasz Adamek?

This is so easy to pick. Haye was the former HW champion of WBA while Adamek has never been the HW World Champion before.

 

Adamek but if they meet probably Haye wins. Tomasz is not even a heavyweight for me, he should box in a smaller division.

 

Adamek

 

The best way to know who's better than the other is to get both of them fight against each other and I'm on for it.

 

Neither of them was UNDISPUTED at CW. Their CW resume is similar.
Haye's HW resume is a bit better since he won the belt, other wins:
Valuev ~ Arreola
Ruiz ~ Golota
lose to Wlad = lose to Vitaly
lose to Thompson > lose to Dawson
Adamek edges competition with his belt at LHW, where he had a few good wins.

 

:deal

Brittards love to forget this fact.

Paper titled disgraces.

 

Do you really think arreola would have used hes sizzling footwork to become the HW champion. He is way to slow to avoid any pucnhes and I think fatola would get KO'd hard.

So hard he might consider getting into shape that fat ****.

 

Truth is, outside of the Klitschkos, Haye would beat (even KO) any other heavyweight out there, and he's not even a true HW!

 

Adamek has the better resume...

 

Nikolay Valuev MD12
John Ruiz TKO9
Jean Marc Mormeck TKO7
Monte Barrett TKO5
Audley Harrison TKO3
Enzo Maccarinelli TKO2
Giacobbe Fragomeni TKO9
Thomas Bonin TKO1
Alexander Gurov KO1


Added Bonin and Gurov to even up the numbers.



Chris Arreola MD12
Steve Cunningham SD12
O'Neil Bell TKO8
Michael Grant UD12
Andrew Golota TKO5
Johnathon Banks TKO8
Jason Estrada UD12
Paul Briggs MD12
Paul Briggs MD12

I would give the edge to Haye based on how he was much more dominant in many of his biggest wins however if Adamek can do an impressive job on Chambers I may have to rethink my answer.

 

Come on... Gurov on the list?! He holds the record of being KO'd in a European titlefight (14s) by a featherfist! The guy makes Hide's chin look like cast iron in comparison... Please chose another :yep

 

Like I said just making up the numbers.

Paul Briggs is on the other list, whats he famous for ?
So is Golota despite having only fought one round in two years against Ray Austin before quitting and being 41 years old.

 

You have a point... only difference is it happened before he fought Haye and Gurov had already been blasted out 3 times! While Briggs was in his prime at the time fighting Adamek and only his "comeback" was a farce.

I 100% agree with this one... Golota that fought Adamek wasn't even a shadow of his former self, and shouldn't count as a big accomplishment.

 

Zombie Golota doesn't count for Adamek... he was beyond shot-to-****.

Even 2 years earlier, Golota was so shot-to-****, he barely out-slugged Kevin ****ing McBride. atsch

 

ehh dont go this road....
if you take "beyond shot-to-****" fighters out of Hayes resume...thats gonna be very short resume