Who has the better Resume? Fury or Big Dosser Femi?

Chisora. Not just the fact that he defeated him but he dominated him like noone else has.

I'm no Fury nut hugger btw. If we're talking about full resumes then AJ's is clearly better.

 

Oh come on that is nonsense. The Chisora win is very good in it’s historical context - but the Wilder win is clearly better. Anyone saying any different is trying to retrospectively discredit that win.

Again though, I think this is just you painfully analysing only ‘resume’ without overall context.

 

As above - Fury had the better big wins, Joshua has the deeper resume overall (on paper).

It’s important to note that Joshua has never fought as the ‘away’ fighter. Both Ruiz fights he was effectively the ‘home’ fighter. He always has ever possible factor weighted in his favour.

 

Deeper resume - 24 puddings and a 41 year old man well past his sell by date.

Tony Dosh PPV nowhere near the same ability level of Lennox Lewis and never will be.

 

Whyte is a pudding that was injured and still wobbled him.

Parker lost to anorexic Hughie Fury.

Joshua (femi) has never once been an underdog at the bookies in any of these so called 50/50 fights

 

Still don't make your statement about him not fighting a man under 39 anything but incorrect. He probably won't be an underdog v Fury come fight night either. So will that win be unworthy in your mind too!?

 

Fury v Joshua is a 50/50 fight to me, I'd favour Fury by a slight margin to get the W but that doesn't change the fact that as things stand Joshua has amassed a far deeper resume than Fury! Having had less fights!

 

Lets go through it fella.

Pulev = old, sex offender
Ruiz 2 = fat blob
Ruiz 1 = fat blob, made him fall on his own leg
Povetkin = old
Parker = overrated
Takam = gifted stoppage
Klit = old, inactive, went life and death
Molina = useless
Breazeale = pudding
Martin = anorexic
Whyte = injured and a pudding

Fights in opponents back yard = 1
Wins in opponents back yard = 0
Roids consumed (tonnes) = 559

Am not saying Joshua (femi) cant fight but the so called resume is a clear myth spun by Eddie Hill’s matchroom FC

 

Can I get your

can I get your views on the following boxers please?
Tom Schwartz
Otto Wallin
Sefer seferi
Francesco pianeta
Chisora
Joey Abell
Christian hammer

 

A win against Chisora is a better win than beating an unbeaten WBC HW champ in his back yard againt the judges waiting in the wings to cheat him?

Ffs youve outdone yourself here

 

Who you choose depends on if your preference is quality or quantity.
If it's quantity then you go with AJ - Old (but still decent) Wlad, Old (but still decent) Povetkin, Parker, Pudding Whyte, Takam, old Pulev. Lost badly to Ruiz but to be fair avenged that loss.
If it's quality then Fury by some way - Wlad when he was still lineal champ and in his backyard, demolished Wilder very impressively, Chisora X2.

I'll go with Fury

 

No problem, lets go through fury’s record

Wilder 2 = world class win
Wallin = won clearly with one eye
Shwarz = pudding
Wilder 1 = world class, robbed win
Pianeta = comeback, allowed
Seferi = comeback, allowed
Klitschko = world class win
Hammer = took povetkin, ortiz, yoka distance, beat price
Chisora 2 = beat whyte
Abell = crap
Cunningham = blown up cruiser

Fights in opponents back yard = 4
Wins in opponents back yard = 4
Roids consumed (grams) = 1 (contaminated meat)

Dont forget David Gaye pulled out twice in 2013 as his toe was hurting. If that had gone ahead it would have been a better win than anything on Joshua (femi)’s record

 

No, he doesn't.

Chisora's best wins are Carlos Takam, Kevin Johnson and David Price. To get those 3 best wins, he's lost 10 times. A record has to be judged on balance, and Chisora's record is absolutely disastrous for a pay-per-view pudding.

Although his record is shallow for a 5 year heavyweight champion, he only has 1 loss on his record. Luis Ortiz is better than anybody on Chisora's record, and he has knocked him out twice. He also wholloped a good version of Stiverne and battered the ghost of Stiverne, who is also better than anybody on Chisora's record. Some people like to regard Szpilka as a notable win on Chisora's record. The truth is that he beat the ghost of Szpilka, as manufactured primarily by Wilder and then pudding Kownacki. Both have defeated Scott, who is useless. Chisora, in all honesty, could lose to the Duhuapas that Wilder faced and also the ghost of Arreola. Does Chisora even beat pudding Breazeale, who Wilder knocked into oblivion?

Considering Wilder's better wins AND the fact he has not been defeated 10 times, it's safe to say that Wilder has the considerably superior record. It's probably one of the most farfetched things I've read on the forum!

I reckon you have visions of Earn every time you close your eyes at night. Abstain from the iFLTV interviews for a bit.

 

Honestly youre better off not wasting your time. He hates fury with a passion and will do anything to discredit his wins.