Who has the better resume, Gennady Golovkin or Terence Crawford

Add Canelo x 2.

And obviously Golovkin. He has fighting opponents at his own natural weight class. Crawford became undisputed weight bully at 140 and since moving to a weight where guys are nearer to his size, he's feasted on - shot Khan, shot Brook and part time commentator 34yo Porter (who was up on the cards when his dad suspiciously threw in the towel).

Crawfords resume is embarassing

 

Crawford. GGG never beat Canelo, either.

 

If you don't count the Canelo win then Crawford

 

Who's resume is better is just a bunch of bs and irrelevant. The fact is that GGG is worthy of his status and so is Crawford.

 

I say Crawford just off the strength of the Postol and Porter wins being better than anything on GGG resume, also even the high I’m not highly impressed with Crawford resume it still blows Golovkins out the water getting a draw then getting beaten up by Canelo when he the only top fighter he’s fought. Multi divisional champion undisputed champion at 140 lineal at 135 can’t really argue it.
Over all though both of them have 2 of the weakest resumes for a supposedly top p4p fighter

 

And Jacobs hasn't?

 

Both of them have pissed about for too long.

 

None of those wins are actually better than beating Matthyse.

I will add that I did misread your post though. I thought you said Porter.

 

I wouldn't.

Sulecki, Mora and Kid Chocolate isn't really impressive at all.

And he didn't even beat Derevyanchanko.