Both are KO artist, both are undefeated, and both really haven't fought anyone to solidify their legacy. Yet Wilder is considered a hype job, while GGG is considered the next face of boxing. Both have to many fights under their belt, to not have faced any real competition. Until both these men face some real comp, neither in my book is any better then the other. A fight with Fury, Klitchko, and possibly Ortiz would be a good test, and victories for Wilder, and Jacobs vs GGG would be a good victory, and a solid opponent, or he could move up in weight, and fight a top contender there. My point being neither of the two shouldn't be praised until they do something worth praising.
GGG and it isn't close. GGG has defeated many top 10 fighter and the others are ducking him. Wilder has fought 1 top fighter and HE IS ducking everybody in the top 10.
Its not even close. GGG hasn't even lost a round and has both Cotto and Canelo running for cover. Wilder is just a product of twitter.
Cotto and Canelo can't even beat Mayweather..they aren't even MW's..they SHOULD run. GGG is just a product of the weakest middleweight era ever. For the first time in memory..160 is weaker than Heavyweight.:deal
GGG fights the best possible fighters in his division Wilder fights the worst of the top 50 in his. Do the math.