Who has the better wins froch or khan

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by IRONSENSE2002, Jul 25, 2011.


  1. sud2002

    sud2002 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Feb 11, 2011
    In terms of having the W... It's really close.

    But if you want to look at it in more depth Frochs fights have been close, some majorly close i.e Taylor and Dirrel

    Where as Khan's fights, if you minus the Maidana round 10 .... All the big fights have been really 1 sided!

    So Khan overall!
     
  2. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Froch, easily.

    Since Khan has beat Judah the Khan lover's have gone crazy, let's not forget Carlos ****ing Baldomir beat a better version of Judah than Khan has just beat.
     
  3. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Lets not forget Froch lost to a post prime Kessler who lost to Ward (who will beat Froch aswell) who also lost to Calzaghe:deal
     
  4. mani0

    mani0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,060
    0
    Sep 29, 2009
    Kelly ****ing Pavlik twice beat a better version of Taylor at his prime weight than Froch.
     
  5. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    True, but the rest of Froch's recent opponent's against Khan's recent opponents... I know which is the better list
     
  6. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    What, lost to a post-prime Kessler, beat a plodding little middleweight coming off a loss and then went life & death with an OAP :lol: Yeah loads better :patsch
     
  7. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Aye, wasn't there a big dispute over the Limond fight?
     
  8. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    So you're a Calzaghe fan!!

    Ahh...

    That would explain your irrational ripping into Hatton in the other thread too.
     
  9. Matt Ldn

    Matt Ldn Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,873
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    i think Froch is ahead but Khan clearly has the greater potential and will go further imo
     
  10. Davew430

    Davew430 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,392
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I'd rather lose to Kessler than Bredis Prescott...

    Abraham was considered a dangerous puncher, nobody expected Froch to do what he did.

    Johnson is a dangerous opponent for any SMW, he's a tough operator and saying different would be stupid.

    Right let's analyse this...

    Khan...

    Judah.

    Past it, i said before the fight even happened i expected Khan to dominate Judah. Zab was past it, got lucky against Matthysse and quit's when the going get's tough.

    McCloskey.

    McCloskey isn't a world beater now is he, not to mention Khan looked terible in this fight.

    Maidana.

    A live opponent, can't knock Khan for this. This is Khan's best win, it was close, he was in serious trouble in R10 but Khan pulled it out of the bag, can't deny this was a good win.

    Malignaggi.

    Malignaggi? Featherfisted, was outboxed by Hatton, who isn't a Boxer. Was also beaten by Juan Diaz. Malignaggi is a dud, end of.

    Salita.

    I don't even need to speak about this.

    Kotelnik.

    The weakest champion in the division, he's a C+ fighter at best, decent fighter but nothing special.

    Barrera.

    The name, nothing more. Barrera was a shell of a man.

    Froch...

    Johnson.

    Froch struggled at time's with an old, past it Johnson. But even though Glencoff is old, he's still tricky for any SMW out there. He draw's people into his type of fight and make's them work for their win.

    Abraham.

    A dangerous puncher, a lot of people thought Abraham would stop Froch. He nearly took Taylor's head off and was starting to really trouble Dirrell before the whole foul ****. Froch pulled out something nobody expected him to, he Boxed.

    Kessler.

    Kessler had lost to Calzaghe and was never the same, he also lost to Ward. But other than Ward is there a better SMW out there than Kessler? Kessler is a good opponent and Froch lost in a close fight.

    Taylor.

    Fair enough Taylor had come up in weight but was expected to do well, Froch was losing on points before pulling out a dramatic last round stoppage, which say's more about Froch pulling out the result he needed

    Pascal.

    He outfought Pascal, in what was a great fight. Now if Pascal had done nothing after this fight it'd be void, but the fact Pascal moved up and beat Chad Dawson, who some classed as the no1 175lbs fighter, made Froch victory a whole lot better. Pascal lost to Hopkins, but Hopkins is a living, fighting legend.

    Now read through them, and i think you'll see Froch's record is a tad better
     
  11. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Calzaghe could have been something really special & any fight with a prime RJJ would have been a pick'em :bbb As for Froch, Calzaghe would have lacyied him, Froch's limitations have been exposed by every half-decent boxer he has faced.
     
  12. Macca L20

    Macca L20 Active Member Full Member

    1,154
    0
    Oct 9, 2009
    Not having that one:nono
     
  13. Rob887

    Rob887 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,546
    0
    May 14, 2011
    Everyone knows Judah has been shot for years, that's the exact reason Khan went into the fight a red hot favourite.

    I'm really surprised how much credit some are giving to the Judah win.
     
  14. PUNCHDRUNK

    PUNCHDRUNK Darth Booth Full Member

    2,400
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    FIXED, I thought Froch & Kahn's record wasn't even close???
     
  15. GlassJawAnalyst

    GlassJawAnalyst Active Member Full Member

    580
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    It's close, Froch is not clearly ahead as some are suggesting.