Who has the greater legacy: Pacquiao or Floyd?

Yeah man, objectivity has much to do with Roach admitting it was their fault. Nice try, come again

 

And Pacquiao did not fight everyone in his era at the right time.. Margarito/Mosley were shot fighters? Remember? Cotto got drained the same two lbs Pac fans claim Floyd drained Canelo. Pac drained De La Hoya to 147

The same mental advantage Pac had over 145 lb Cotto? You speaking on that or no?

 

His own f'ing trainer said it was their fault.. And people are still trying to blame Mayweather.. Clear agendas smh

 

There is a significant consensus regarding how boring Mayweather was and yes, he was a very good boxer, particularly his defensive ability.

Anyway, I can't go on arguing with you, I'm too busy. You are clearly a Mayweather pervert and cannot be educated. That's okay, I can accept that, but I still stand by everything I said.

Certainly I'm not interested in or swayed by anything Roach or the corrupt boxing media have to say. I have my own mind and, as you point out yourself, I do know quite a bit about the boxing game.

If I get time later I'll address your points, but I'm not that interested in is debate so don't count on it.

This thread was about legacy, and I still say that name for name, fight for fight Pacquiao has the greater legacy. Not that I really care at this point.

 

Id say Pac. The beatings he gave ODLH, Hatton, Cotto and Maragarito were amazing. Floyd taking apart Hatton, Coralles, Gatti and (eventhough smaller) Marquez were impressive as well.

 

The damn fighter himself said that he waited until it was the right time to fight Pac. Be consistent!!!

LMAO!!!

 

Roach's comments don't prove anything, he said what he said during the context of a promotion.

Anyway, you are a proven Mayweather fetishist and as such it is pointless continuing to debate with you; for one thing, I just don't have the time.

Good luck, bro. I still enjoy reading your crazy comments, you definitely bring a great sense of fun and absurdity to the forum.

We'll have to agree to disagree; no hard feelings.

 

Because you lost it. You have no objectivity young sir! You can't debate because you have nothing to back up your facts with while that video just destroyed everything you said!

What's fact is that Roach + Pacquiao ducked that fight until 2015! Admitted by Roach himself, and it was not out of context, he spoke from his heart!

 

Wrong. Floyd only said it was the right time for that fight to be made cause of the huge money both he and Pacquiao going to make in which Floyd is right smh. And I'm sorry is Floyd 2 years older then Pacquiao? I'm confused.

 

See a shrink, bro.

You and I have crossed swords over this Mayweather stuff before. Our previous debate didn't go anywhere and I ended up, disappointingly, being nasty to you. I don't want to go down that road again.

I haven't lost anything, I stand by everything I say. You can't see it and that is absolutely fine with me. I genuinely don't have the time to keep going back and forth with you.

We can agree to disagree, can't we? In spite of your Mayweather perversion I'm one of the few posters on here who actually quite likes you!

 

Boring is irrelevant and subjective it doesn't determine greatness how many times does this needs to be stressed?

And you're an irrational bitter hater who thinks he knows more about boxing than people like Roach and says that PBF isn't a great fighter.

And I'm certainly not swayed by someone like you who is so far off base that it's ridiculous. You're probably the same kind of fool who thought a guy who couldn't even beat JMM clearly in 4 fights would beat a boxing master like PBF? You thought a guy who couldn't even cut off the ring could beat PBF. You thought a guy with no jab could beat PBF. You thought a guy who has no answer for the way PBF controls range and dictated distance could beat PBF. You thought Pac would simply overwhelm PBF with speed and angles. Let me tell you something you don't know **** about boxing. PBF is light years more complete and better than Pac and beats any version of him and it was always easy to see.

Don't get mad at the outcome because you prefer Pac as a person and like his style more. PBF didn't even have to get out of first gear to beat Pac it was one of his easiest fights in years yet you want to sit here and argue with people who are more credible than anyone here about how Pac is greater? Give it up you've already lost. I don't see one boxing publication that has Pac ranked higher than PBF but I've listed two of the biggest that have PBF ranked higher and Pac's own trainer stating the same. You've lost this debate just like Pac lost the fight with PBF.
PBF>Pac.

 

We can agree to disagree!

 

Since Floyd is right.. He also said after the Mosley fight that Pacquiao refused testing.. And that if he tests.. There would be a fight. We can be consistent if you'd like. Pac ducked Floyd because he was afraid of needles. THAT came from his camp as well.

 

At least you're not one of those poster who care about fighters being weight drained or anything.

 

I'm in the middle of cooking dinner, I just don't have the time to respond to your obsessive and increasingly hostile comments.

I'm not mad, bro; you are, just listen to yourself, you're ranting and insulting; it's pathetic and hardly the conduct of a grown man.

Your Mayweather fetish is out of control!

I haven't lost anything, name for name, fight for fight, I still say Pacquiao had the better career.

You make a lot of negative assumptions and generalisations about me personally and my knowledge base without any evidence. Again, not very mature and utterly pointless.

Finally, you call yourself "Pimp"; another red flag. Real pimps are the scum of the earth, bro and the fact that you wish to associate yourself with that type of character is further proof that you are an absolute clown whose opinion is utterly worthless.

Good day to you, sir and good luck with with your creepy Mayweather obsession.