Who hit harder? Corrie Sanders or Earnie Shavers

:nod

 

I'd buy that Morrison was the hardest puncher of that group. Not the best, but the hardest.

 

Shavers would of been too little to be competitive as a heavyweight today, however he would be a good cruiserweight

 

Morrison would be eaten alive be Wlad

 

Shavers, c'mon man

 

Nearly half of the guys Shavers fought weighed less then 200 lbs, nearly 75% Corrie Sanders fought weight more then 225. Some of you people are stuck in the past.

 

I would go with Shavers, but once Sanders got a bead on a guy? It was like a rapid fire dual cannon. Sanders was an AMAZING finisher.

 

This content is protected

 

Lyke any guy fite from sixties or sevens can lyke nock ne1 from historie out . fiters from dem days were tuffer den ne1. ali walked on water nd frasier krane healed a blind man.

 

After carefully reading all responses I can definitely say that Sanders has much more solid claim at being the greatest puncher than Shavers.

 

I would not want to get by either of them!

 

:rofl

 

Shaver's KO performance is based on koing cruisers, he only fought 23 genuine heavyweights and KO'd only 11 of them, for an unimpressive 47.8% KO ratio

:-(

And interestingly enough, Shavers almost never managed to knock out any of the legends that praised his supposedly humongous power

I dont buy that Shavers hits harder than Tyson for a second, **** what Holmes' says, he got up from Shavers' bombs, and defeated him twice, they fought like 22 rounds, but he didn't last 4 against Tyson.

It's true what they say, boxers tend to praise more those fighters whom they managed to beat, just so they themselves can look more G

 

Shavers, brah

 

Shavers an American legend???


Way to expose your own ignorance.


Keith