Who hit harder - David Haye or Sam Peter

I think you already answered your own question.

 

p4p, Haye @ CW might be the harder puncher between them.

@ HW, Peter by some distance.

 

David Haye has no achilles heel, he has an achilles toe. Peter knocks down trees he dropped Wlad multiple times, Haye hardly made him blink. Not even close.

 

Peter has power that can remove you from your senses (real knockouts), while Haye's punches have more of a shock effect.
Two completely different kind of punchers.

 

Peter is naturally the larger man and is built like a tank, he hits harder and is generally more powerful. In a p4p sense Haye hits harder in my honest opinion, in h2h sense he is more explosive, faster and his punches carry a more shockingly vicious snap. Anyone using Peter knocking down Wladimir as an example though are idiots.

 

Sam Peter

 

Sam Peter couldn't knock out James Toney over 24 rounds.
Vitali couldn't put a dent in Chisora.

Haye.

 

What does Vitali have to do with anything?

Sam Peter clearly hit harder

 

Haye wouldn't KO Toney either

And no one said Vittles hits harder than Haye

 

Sam Peter and it's not even close

 

I once talked to Eddie Chambers and he told me that Sam Peters power was overrated

 

Sam Peter. What Haye has for him is speed, that's what makes those punches hit harder than they actually are because most opponents don't see them coming. Peter is generally more powerful in my opinion.

 

Peter.

 

Chisora couldn't take Haye's power but took everything Vitali threw at him. Why did i even need to explain that to you two pair of clowns.