Lewis on straight punches. Tyson on the uppercuts. He had fantastic leverage on thos uppercuts, they were brutal. Hooks- edge for Tyson.
I actually did an entire thread explaining the situation, I presented facts and articles supporting my argument. I'm guessing you chose to ignore it because it doesn't suit your agenda.
your article has exactly the same credibility than the mine. and plus i have videos of george calling tyson. your argument is " my article is right but your article is wrong because i am ironchamp". you have your opinion and i have the mine.none will change his mind.
Ive got videos of me calling out George Foreman i wonder why Forman never replied? and thats exactly what Tyson thought
foreman was a former hw champ,top 5 hw ever, who was stronger than tyson,bigger than tyson, harder puncher than tyson,he had better chin than tyson,he was stronger mentally than tyson , he was not scared of tyson and he did return to the boxing because his style was made to defeat tyson. and your are nothing . great difference:deal
old foreman was too slow to beat peak tyson look what tyson done to an old holmes it would have been exactly the same outcome give or take a round or 2 .:hat
Hey, I hit the wrong button. Careless Me! I voted for Lewis whereas I meant to vote for Tyson. So count one more for Tyson and one less for Lewis.
obviously you exposed the ignorant who you are. larry holmes in 1988 was completely a shot who did nothing during 2 years . holmes was an stylist old,fat,slow without confidence. old foreman 89-91 had much better chin than old holmes, x3 more hitting power,x3 stronger, and his style was completely different. is not matter if tyson was faster, finally he would exchange blows with foreman . george would take the shots from tyson but tyson was hurt by bruno and tucker, he was ko by buster douglas,foreman was much harder puncher. tyson would not take the shots from foreman. tyson was finished mentally in 90-91 and foreman fought 12 rounds against the best boxer at the time, prime holyfield.
Foreman was not a harder puncher than Bruno at this stage of his career, because they both took part in a head to head test using a pressure sensor and Brunos punch was measured to be harder.
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:nut proofs please proofs george foreman even today is harder puncher than prime bruno lol evander holyfield faced tyson,lewis,bert cooper,bowe, david tua was his sparring partner and he said that even old foreman was harder puncher than all them. basically you are a liar
If testimony of opponents is important, then you must respect the fact that every common oponent and sparring partner between George Foreman and Sonny Liston said that Liston hit harder, as did every common oponent between George Foreman and Earnie Shavers. You can't pick and choose which oponents testimonies you will accept and which you wont.
obviously testimony vs facts i will pick facts.... wepner said "liston was the hardest puncher i faced ever" but the facts are foreman did stop him in 3 rounds and liston did stop wepner in 10 by cuts.the facts are foreman faced better and stronger boxers than liston did and foreman has much better ko%, the facts are i have eyes.... and i can see in their fights that foreman was harder puncher, and today every expert know that george foreman was harder puncher than liston with both hands and stronger. george foreman faced ali74 shavers faced a shot ali 77 foreman knocked out lyle lyle took the shots from shavers anyway shavers is debatable. but foreman was better boxer, he had better chin, he had more strength and he had brutal hitting power in both hands!!!