Who hits harder: Wilder or Wlad

To hit hard, you have to LAND. 80% of Wilder's drunken sailor windmills aren't even landing.

 

Wilder could only dream of throwing and landing a series of devastating punches with this kind of fluidity.

This content is protected

 

Wilder he ko's people with out proper form he fights like a five year old but hits like a mack truck

 

Ray Austin??? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

Laugh at Ray Austin all you want, but a shot decrepit version was able to outbox Wilders best win for almost 10 rounds. Also based on Wilder struggles with mediocrities like Washington a prime Austin would give him a run for his money. All that aside... Completely irrelevant - Wilder is incapable of throwing and landing those kinds of punches is he not?

 

Funny how you "haha" a guy like Ray Austin but talk up no-hopers like Arreola, Wawraszyk, Szpilka and Molina.

 

You can't make this **** up either lol... Should've put up the Pulev video Frankenstein.

 

You never heard me talk up any of them mother****ers lol... And Austin always had shaky whiskers.

 

Ray Austin couldn't beat Harlod Scoriners. But he's a good win for Wlad according to this world engine headed fool. LOL

 

Yep all facts there I stated Blizzy, this was to mostly highlight how devastating Wlads punching power is and how gifted of a fighter he is. You'll be hard pressed to find a 6'5+ HW who can throw multiple lethal hooks like that in succession. Wlder certainly isn't!

 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

 

I dont like Bailey but he explained it best. Now if you ask me who hits harder? Wilder with the right hand and Wlad with the left hook.

 

You're an absolute joke you deranged fanboi . There was one decent left hook thrown with good form and technique . The rest were half hooks which Austin fell into.

No gifted boxer goes life n death with Sam Peter. Wilder would have cleaned Peter clock and would have look spectacular doing it.

 

Mentally ill Dinovelvet cherrypicking and leaving context out again. Conveniently leaving out that loss was in 2000, when Austin was just getting his career started and Sconiers was clearly more capable than the version who fought and managed to drop Wilder TEN years later. I don't view it as a great win at all either, it's an ok win. Certainly better than any of Wilders title defenses. Austin proved his worth by holding his own with and beating some capable contenders before and after the fact. Of course you'll ignore that a decrepit Austin was outboxing Wilders best win in Stiverne, because you just bend and twist things to fit your warped agenda.

 

You're an absolute joke you deranged detractor. Propping up Wilder solely because your enemies on this board are critics of him. You are beyond pathetic.