Who hits harder: Wilder or Wlad

Who won Austin or Stiverne. Lets change lanes. Lets go to the video tape lol...

 

This content is protected

Larry said, " A fight ain't over if you can punch"! Lol

 

Remember how you used argue obsessively how Wlad only lost to Brewster cos he was drugged?
I see you don't peddle that two -bit inane drivel any longer. Maybe one day you will come to your senses about Wlad too and see that he's not everything you think he is.

 

Drugged? Wait what???

 

A shot 40+ year old Austin who was years removed from contention was up on two cards going into the 10th... It's not a stretch to conclude a prime Austin would have mopped the floor with Stiverne.

 

I believe something medically was wrong with him i.e adrenaline dump(even Steward thought something wasn't right), not that he was drugged. Coming to ones senses as opposed to being an erratic hater like you? You're far from rational my friend.

 

Lmmfao... You are truly a moron lol.

 

Nice rebuttal.

 

'prime' Austin couldn't beat Harlod Scoiners.. Wilder in only in his 13th bout when raw , green and could barely box blew Scoiners away in 4 rounds

Auatin is one of Wlads best wins Couldn't beat a very early Wilder victim

 

The only thing wrong with him was Brewsters FISTS

 

Classic Dinovelvet agenda driven cherrypicking that falls apart at the seams as soon as it's read by a semi rational person.

 

I respect Austin. It's just that you're a terrible poster. You didn't actually think that Wlad was poisoned against Brewster...did you!!!

 

Nope. I've never subscribed to that theory, but I do think that Wlads extreme fatigue was unusual - as medical tests determined, but could easily be explained medically. Steward thought something wasn't quite right with him either.

 

So was he drugged?