If you have read any of my comments, you will know that I tend to favour the old-timers over today's pugilists, but I think Floyd belongs in any era with his defence and versatility. My question is this: Who would you bet on to beat Mayweather? I can think of lots of good fights for Floyd, but not too many fighters I would chance my money on. Keep it to 3. Here's my tentative picks: 1. Robinson. 2. Hearns 3. Forrest. The fight is at Welterweight over 15 rounds.
I'm not saying others couldn't, Dave. As I said, there are plenty of good fights. Gavilan or Napoles would be great opponents, for instance. Name a few you favour; be nice to hear people's views on this.
Three excellent picks. That is a hellish gauntlet to run through right there. From the more modern era, I'd say Mosley, Oscar and Trinidad at their best all have a decent shot. Montreal Duran? Very distinct possibility. I wonder how Floyd's defensive excellence along the ropes would cope with Duran's relentless aggression and animal ferocity.
Duran and Leonard are very interesting, Dave. I was thinking of a chess match type fight between Ray and Floyd the other day. Leonard outboxed Benitez, as you know, so it would be fascinating to see if Ray could make Mayweather lead. Do you rate Floyd? I think he would be a ******* to fight!
Assuming he did agree to fight them: No, nobody can get Mayweather lead unless they're completely outgunned and helpless. Leonard would be just fine leading and then countering Mayweather's counters. It would be a chess match, but only for about 6 or 7 rounds, then the difference in ability becomes clearer. Mayweather only throws one punch a at a time, maaaaybe two if he's really got a wide opening, and Leonard will be punching in combinations. You think Leonard won't know how to solve that flat footed shoulder roll defense? Leonard throws combinations to the head and body 3,4,5 at a time... He'll be landing while Mayweather waits to counter with his short right or hook. He is awesome to watch, and I think he gives a hard time to many welters, even many great ones, but if what you mean by "rating" is rank him among the greats, he falls short. He has done a great job of avoiding the toughest challenges throughout his career and is very overrated right now. In 10 years, he'll be viewed more realistically, somewhere between the "haters" who think he's a piece of **** and the "*****s" who vastly and blindly overrate him. Head to head, he is quite a fighter.
Trinidad is an interesting choice. He could be outboxed for 7 rounds or whatever but if he hit Mayweather with a glancing blow in the right spot it could change the fight. Tito had serious fight changing power at `47 and `54. He carried that power the distance as well. Not saying Mayweather couldn`t outbox him but it would be a level of Welterweight that he has never faced before. A dangerous night.
I was going to add something about Tito, because I love him as a fighter and would so love to say Tito knocks him senseless, but that would be dishonest. Floyd probably spoils and potshots Tito, making him miss and pay; Trinidad wasn't very creative or adaptable. If what he was doing wasn't working, he'd keep trying, and perhaps, later in the fight, when Floyd gets too comfortable or makes a mistake, Felix lands something that changes the momentum. It very well could happen, but probably wouldn't.
Robinson kills him with the left hook. Leonard humiliates him, then knocks him out. Hearns puts him away early. Pryor would eat his punches, then swarm him to death.